On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Christian Heimes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
What's wrong with the rfe type? Why does it have to be a keyword?
For one it's the name. Personally I didn't know the meaning of RFE until
I googled it.
I agree, the name is a bit confusing
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Problem is, we don't have an 'rfe' keyword anymore :)
Shall we grow one again?
What's wrong with the rfe type? Why does it have to be a keyword?
It must have changed since I last looked at a feature request on the
tracker - using a type rather than keyword is fine by
On 20 Feb, 06:08, Bill Janssen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suggest using socket.dup(sslsock) to simply create a non-encrypted
copy of the socket, and switch to using that copy. There's no way to
unwrap an SSLSocket.
It does not seem to work:
File C:\python26\lib\ssl.py, line 115, in read
Andrew MacIntyre wrote:
M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
If we're down to voting, here's my vote:
+1 on removing the freelists from ints and floats, but not the
small int sharing optimization
+1 on focusing on improving pymalloc to handle int and float
object allocations even better
-1 on
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008, Andrew MacIntyre wrote:
I've now written up my testing and attached the write-up to issue 2039
(http://bugs.python.org/issue2039).
Nice work! Too often we (generic we) don't try to re-simplify code.
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) *
We have a bug day this Saturday. Join us on IRC and let's see how
many issues we can clear up.
http://wiki.python.org/moin/PythonBugDay for more.
There are currently 69 bugs marked as 'easy', which is probably more
than enough, but if you see anything that's suitable for a new
developer, please
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Mark Dickinson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 1:52 AM, Raymond Hettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, it would be useful to have a new method, float.is_integer(). This
would be better than the current approach where we make the
test: if x == floor(x).
How common is
I suggest using socket.dup(sslsock) to simply create a non-encrypted
copy of the socket, and switch to using that copy. There's no way to
unwrap an SSLSocket.
It does not seem to work:
File C:\python26\lib\ssl.py, line 115, in read
return self._sslobj.read(len)
ssl.SSLError:
I agree, the name is a bit confusing when you're not used to it.
Renaming it is easy. To the native speakers reading it: What should
it be called? (please try to come up with something shorter than
request for enhancement)
Also I find that, by definition, RFE and feature requests are not
On Feb 20, 2008 8:03 AM, A.M. Kuchling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a bug day this Saturday. Join us on IRC and let's see how
many issues we can clear up.
http://wiki.python.org/moin/PythonBugDay for more.
There are currently 69 bugs marked as 'easy', which is probably more
than
On Feb 20, 2008 12:39 PM, Brett Cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 20, 2008 12:36 PM, Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree, the name is a bit confusing when you're not used to it.
Renaming it is easy. To the native speakers reading it: What should
it be called? (please
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 12:37:42PM -0800, Brett Cannon wrote:
How about marking already submitted patches as easy to get help
reviewing? For instance, there are a bunch of test rewrites to move
old tests to unittest where it would be rather nice to have another
pair of eyes make sure that the
Renaming it is easy. To the native speakers reading it: What should
it be called? (please try to come up with something shorter than
request for enhancement)
feature request?
How about calling it just enhancement?
___
Python-Dev mailing
It must have changed since I last looked at a feature request on the
tracker - using a type rather than keyword is fine by me.
I'm fairly certain the rfe type was there ever since the switchover
(at least that's what subversion says: the rfe type was added along
with all other types in r52825,
On Feb 20, 2008 12:36 PM, Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree, the name is a bit confusing when you're not used to it.
Renaming it is easy. To the native speakers reading it: What should
it be called? (please try to come up with something shorter than
request for enhancement)
Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Feb 20, 2008 12:39 PM, Brett Cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 20, 2008 12:36 PM, Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree, the name is a bit confusing when you're not used to it.
Renaming it is easy. To the native speakers reading it: What should
it be
I consider a feature request something like asking a factorial method (
http://bugs.python.org/issue2138). As for the RFE, (from Wikipedia) while
not technically a bug, it is often tracked in the same manner as a bug as it
represents a failure to meet expected behavior, or simply out of
Virgil Dupras wrote:
On 2/19/08, Virgil Dupras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
closed_status = db.status.lookup('chatting')
Oops, replace 'chatting' with 'closed'
Ok, I ran the script. It said
Low activity tickets (180 days) broken down per resolution status:
- no selection -547
wont fix
18 matches
Mail list logo
