Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Jeffrey Yasskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 2:15 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > On 02:21 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> > >>OTOH, I'd rather there be OOWTDI so whatever the consensus is is fin
I've forwarding my most recent update to issue 2550 here such that the proposed
patch (and in general, the approach to network-oriented test cases) can be
vetted by a wider audience:
http://bugs.python.org/file9980/trunk.2550-2.patch
This patch works towards fixing a large proportion of the te
Can anybody please point me why print('a', 'b', sep=None, end=None) should
produce "a b\n" instead of "ab"?
I've read http://docs.python.org/dev/3.0/library/functions.html#print, pep-3105
and some
ml threads but did not find a good reason justifying such a strange behaviour.
Thanks.
-Ale
Alessandro Guido wrote:
> Can anybody please point me why print('a', 'b', sep=None, end=None) should
> produce "a b\n" instead of "ab"?
> I've read http://docs.python.org/dev/3.0/library/functions.html#print,
> pep-3105 and some
> ml threads but did not find a good reason justifying such a strange
Alessandro Guido wrote:
> Can anybody please point me why print('a', 'b', sep=None, end=None) should
> produce "a b\n" instead of "ab"?
> I've read http://docs.python.org/dev/3.0/library/functions.html#print,
> pep-3105 and some
> ml threads but did not find a good reason justifying such a strange
Alessandro Guido wrote:
> Can anybody please point me why print('a', 'b', sep=None, end=None) should
> produce "a b\n" instead of "ab"?
> I've read http://docs.python.org/dev/3.0/library/functions.html#print,
> pep-3105 and some
> ml threads but did not find a good reason justifying such a strange
Alessandro Guido wrote:
> Can anybody please point me why print('a', 'b', sep=None, end=None) should
> produce "a b\n" instead of "ab"?
> I've read http://docs.python.org/dev/3.0/library/functions.html#print,
> pep-3105 and some
> ml threads but did not find a good reason justifying such a strange
[Sorry for the dupes. Lesson: never try and send mail from a moving train.]
Eric Smith wrote:
> Alessandro Guido wrote:
>> Can anybody please point me why print('a', 'b', sep=None, end=None) should
>> produce "a b\n" instead of "ab"?
>> I've read http://docs.python.org/dev/3.0/library/functions.h
Anyone happen to have the key handy that Wingware were giving out to sprinters
at PyCon? For the life of me, I can't find what I did with that piece of
paper. If someone could forward me it off list, that'd be great.
Trent.
___
Python-Dev mailing
Nick Coghlan wrote:
> So that print(a, b) does the right thing (i.e. matches the Python 2.x
> print statement's behaviour)
AFAICS print(a, b) does the right thing because default values of "sep" and
"end" are ' ' and '\n' respectively, doesn't it?
Eric Smith wrote:
> Because None means 'use the
On Mar 26, 2008, at 7:34 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
> zooko wrote:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-March/078243.html
>> Here is a simple proposal: make the standard Python "import"
>> mechanism notice eggs on the PYTHONPATH and insert them (into the
>> *same* location) on
Alessandro Guido wrote:
> «print strings 'a' and 'b' using the default separator and the default
> terminator»
>
> However i'll just cope with it, Python is still the best language ;)
I definitely recommend getting used to this idiom - None is used to
indicate missing (i.e. 'use the default val
On 08/04/2008, zooko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By the way, since I posted my proposal two weeks ago I have pointed a
> couple of Python hackers who currently refuse to use eggs at the URL:
>
> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-March/078243.html
>
> They both agreed that it mad
zooko wrote:
>
> On Mar 26, 2008, at 7:34 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
>> zooko wrote:
>
> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-March/078243.html
>
>>> Here is a simple proposal: make the standard Python "import"
>>> mechanism notice eggs on the PYTHONPATH and insert them (into the
At 10:01 AM 4/8/2008 -0700, zooko wrote:
>On Mar 26, 2008, at 7:34 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
> > zooko wrote:
>
>http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-March/078243.html
>
> >> Here is a simple proposal: make the standard Python "import"
> >> mechanism notice eggs on the PYTHONPATH and
All sorted, thanks.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Trent Nelson
> Sent: 08 April 2008 15:48
> To: python-dev@python.org
> Subject: [Python-Dev] [OT] Wingware IDE key for sprinters at PyCon
>
> Anyone happen to have the key handy t
On Apr 8, 2008, at 11:27 AM, Lloyd Kvam wrote:
>
> When I wear my sysadmin hat, eggs become a nuisance.
...
> As a developer, eggs are great.
...
> Fortunately, distutils includes tools like bdist_rpm so that python
> modules can be packaged for easy processing by the system package
> manager. So
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 5:00 AM, Trent Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've forwarding my most recent update to issue 2550 here such that the
> proposed patch (and in general, the approach to network-oriented test cases)
> can be vetted by a wider audience:
>
> http://bugs.python.org/file9980
zooko wrote:
> 1. You can't conveniently install eggs into a non-system directory,
> such as ~/my-python-stuff.
>
> 2. If you allow even a single egg to be installed into your
> PYTHONPATH, it will change the semantics of your PYTHONPATH.
I discovered another annoyance with eggs the other
Committed the patch in r62234. Hopefully the work paid off! (He says moments
before all the buildbots turn red...)
From: Gregory P. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 April 2008 20:58
To: Trent Nelson
Cc: python-dev@python.org
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] Cha
zooko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am skeptical that prorgammers are going to be willing to use a new
> database format. They already have a database -- their filesystem --
> and they already have the tools to control it -- mv, rm, and
> PYTHONPATH. Many of them already hate the existence the
>
Alessandro Guido wrote:
> Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Eric Smith wrote:
>> Because None means 'use the default value'. You probably want:
>> print('a', 'b', sep='', end='')
>
> I think this is a "not optimally designed" API
> because you have to read the documentation to understand why
Excuse me, I do
"Michael Foord" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| > Someone please open a bug for this task.
| >
| >
| This sounds like a good compromise and I'm happy to take on the cleanup
| - unless someone else beats me to it. I guess it should wait until 3.0
| final is out of the
At 10:49 PM 4/8/2008 -0400, Stanley A. Klein wrote:
>On Tue, April 8, 2008 9:37 pm, Ben Finney
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 11:37:07 +1000
> > From: Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: [Distutils] how to easily consume just the parts of eggs
> > thata
On Apr 8, 2008, at 11:47 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> I think, however, that the docs should be revised now, for 2.6/3.0.
> In the list of methods under TestCase Objects, the preferred method
> of each
> pair (or triplit) should be given first and the others marked as
> future
> deprecations, not r
25 matches
Mail list logo
