http://www.python.org/download/releases/2.6/NEWS.txt
Seems a bit mislabelled if nothing else.
Martin How so? The first major heading in that file reads
Seems more like the Misc/NEWS file to me.
Correct.
I was expecting Andrew's What's New document
Why that? The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin points out that in the past, as part of the release process,
we've built separate downloadable documentation.
Do we still want to do that for Python 2.6 and 3.0, and if so, how do
we go about doing that? I have this feeling that
PyPy offers sandboxing interpreter without compromising language
features itself. Here are docs:
http://codespeak.net/pypy/dist/pypy/doc/sandbox.html
Also, are you aware of directory Lib/test/crashers (in python's svn)
which contains some possible ways to segfault cpython? (which can lead
to
On Sep 19, 2008, at 7:20 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
Martin points out that in the past, as part of the release process,
we've built separate downloadable documentation.
Do we still want to do that for Python 2.6 and 3.0, ...?
Yes, I think so. The downloads are very useful for people who
+1.
I find the offline versions to be vital.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 19, 2008, at 12:20 PM, Barry Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin points out that in the past, as part of the release process,
we've built separate downloadable
Hello,
I'm a little clueless about exact semantics of following snippets:
http://paste.pocoo.org/show/85698/
is this fine?
or shall I fill the bug?
(the reason to ask is because a) django is relying on this b) pypy
implements it differently)
cheers,
fijal
Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
Hello,
I'm a little clueless about exact semantics of following snippets:
http://paste.pocoo.org/show/85698/
is this fine?
It looks right to me. :-)
In the first case the NameError is caught by the except and not
re-raised (but still enters the finally after
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (09/12/08 - 09/19/08)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue
number. Do NOT respond to this message.
2035 open (+36) / 13696 closed (+24) / 15731 total (+60)
Open issues with patches: 652
В Птн, 19/09/2008 в 17:43 +0200, Maciej Fijalkowski пишет:
Hello,
I'm a little clueless about exact semantics of following snippets:
http://paste.pocoo.org/show/85698/
is this fine?
or shall I fill the bug?
(the reason to ask is because a) django is relying on this b) pypy
implements
Hello Maciej,
Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
Hello,
I'm a little clueless about exact semantics of following snippets:
http://paste.pocoo.org/show/85698/
is this fine?
or shall I fill the bug?
(the reason to ask is because a) django is relying on this b) pypy
implements it differently)
Note
Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Mark Seaborn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes. The renaming of im_self and im_func is good. The removal of
unbound methods is a *big* problem [1].
Regards,
Mark
[1]
Hello all!
The code coverage site at http://coverage.livinglogic.de/ was broken for
the last few months. It's fixed again now and runs the test suite once
per day with
regrtest.py -T -N -uurlfetch,largefile,network,decimal
Servus,
Walter
___
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 18:26:05 +0200, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello Maciej,
Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
Hello,
I'm a little clueless about exact semantics of following snippets:
http://paste.pocoo.org/show/85698/
is this fine?
or shall I fill the bug?
(the reason to ask
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 9:30 PM, Jean-Paul Calderone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 18:26:05 +0200, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Maciej,
Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
Hello,
I'm a little clueless about exact semantics of following snippets:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Walter Dörwald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all!
The code coverage site at http://coverage.livinglogic.de/ was broken for
the last few months. It's fixed again now and runs the test suite once
per day with
regrtest.py -T -N
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brett Cannon wrote:
Well, 'time' says the test takes 16.09 sec user and 16.09 sec system
on my MacBook, but a total execution time of almost 8 *minutes*. That
is too long to be on by default.
Uh... That is very strange.
Under Solaris 10:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 8:36 PM, Jesus Cea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brett Cannon wrote:
Well, 'time' says the test takes 16.09 sec user and 16.09 sec system
on my MacBook, but a total execution time of almost 8 *minutes*. That
is too long to be
17 matches
Mail list logo