On 10.06.10 21:31, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 6/10/2010 7:08 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>> Walter Dörwald wrote:
>
The PEP would also serve as a reference back to both this discussion and
the previous one (which was long enough ago that I've forgotten most of
it).
>>>
>>> I too think t
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2010-06-04 - 2010-06-11)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue
number. Do NOT respond to this message.
2764 open (+54) / 18028 closed (+23) / 20792 total (+77)
Open issues with patches: 1115
Ave
The logging module taught me something today about the difference of a
function defined in C and a function defined in Python::
import importlib
class Base:
def imp(self, name):
return self.import_(name)
class CVersion(Base):
import_ = __import__
class PyVersion(Base):
2010/6/11 Brett Cannon :
> This "magical" ignoring of self seems to extend to any PyCFunction. Is
> this dichotomy intentional or just a "fluke"? Maybe this is a
> hold-over from before we had descriptors and staticmethod, but now
> that we have these things perhaps this difference should go away.
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> 2010/6/11 Brett Cannon :
>> This "magical" ignoring of self seems to extend to any PyCFunction. Is
>> this dichotomy intentional or just a "fluke"? Maybe this is a
>> hold-over from before we had descriptors and staticmethod, but now
>> t
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 18:30, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Benjamin Peterson
> wrote:
>> 2010/6/11 Brett Cannon :
>>> This "magical" ignoring of self seems to extend to any PyCFunction. Is
>>> this dichotomy intentional or just a "fluke"? Maybe this is a
>>> hold-o
