Terry Reedy wrote:
On 6/7/2011 5:35 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
I know that this style is unpopular, but if it helps, try mentally
pronouncing == in C as is the value of.
In this example, when I read that line, my mind is thinking:
if 'u' is the value of typecode
After ~12 years of
I would like to try to address some shortfalls with the way python deals with
abstract base classes containing descriptors. I originally was just concerned
with improving support for defining abstract properties with the decorator
syntax and converting between abstract and concrete properties, but
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:37 AM, Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com wrote:
Just be careful not to reproduce http://www.apress.com/9781590593714 :-)
These things tend to get out of hand very quickly.
At the level Glyph and Martin are talking about, you're more likely to
end up with
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz gl...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
how is UDP different from TCP?
The phrase UDP never appears in the HOWTO. DGRAM sockets get a brief
mention as anything else in the sentence: ... you’ll get better behavior
and performance from a STREAM socket
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 7:35 AM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote:
After ~12 years of doing this, it comes naturally. I appreciate that
this may come across as weird though :)
I actually thought Brett's rationale in the checkin comment was
reasonable (if you get in the habit of putting
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 7:04 AM, Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info wrote:
..
Whereas I read it as 'has the value' (or just 'is' ;=).
Am I the only one who reads == as equals?
If you are, you are the only one who reads it correctly. Consider
a = 2
a == 2.0
True
On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 21:04:48 +1000, Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info wrote:
Terry Reedy wrote:
On 6/7/2011 5:35 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
I know that this style is unpopular, but if it helps, try mentally
pronouncing == in C as is the value of.
In this example, when I read that
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Darren Dale dsdal...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip excellent analysis of the problem]
I have some suggestions regarding a few details of your current code,
but your basic proposal looks sound to me.
I would tweak __new__ along the following lines though:
def
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com wrote:
Just be careful not to reproduce http://www.apress.com/9781590593714 :-)
These things tend to get out of hand very quickly.
You say that like it's a bad thing. The first few chapters of that
would make a great replacement
I'm writing in regards to http://bugs.python.org/issue1195571
I'm embedding Python in my application and ran into a need for this
functionality. I wrote a similar patch myself, and was about to submit
it. When I searched for similar issues I found that this one has been
available since 2005.
I'd
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Darren Dale dsdal...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip excellent analysis of the problem]
I have some suggestions regarding a few details of your current code,
but your basic proposal looks sound to
Le jeudi 09 juin 2011 à 02:30 +0200, brian.curtin a écrit :
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/f1509fc75435
changeset: 70715:f1509fc75435
branch: 2.7
parent: 70661:6e7a98cfcfab
user:Brian Curtin br...@python.org
date:Wed Jun 08 19:29:53 2011 -0500
summary:
Merge
On 6/8/2011 3:30 PM, Tom Whittock wrote:
I'm writing in regards to http://bugs.python.org/issue1195571
I'm embedding Python in my application and ran into a need for this
functionality. I wrote a similar patch myself, and was about to submit
it. When I searched for similar issues I found that
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Darren Dale dsdal...@gmail.com wrote:
That should be get_abstract_names(namespace), since ns.items() gets
called again in the for loop. I think the get_abstract_names function
isn't needed though, since it is only ever called that one time. Any
reason not
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 21:07, geremy condra debat...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com wrote:
Just be careful not to reproduce http://www.apress.com/9781590593714 :-)
These things tend to get out of hand very quickly.
You say that like it's
15 matches
Mail list logo
