What's the python-dev view on this?
Original Message
Subject: Anyone still using Python 2.5?
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 07:15:46 +
From: Chris Withers
To: Python List ,
"testing-in-pyt...@lists.idyll.org" ,
simplis...@googlegroups.com
Hi All,
What's the general consensus o
Hi All,
I posted this several days ago in python mailing list but got no response
and I think it might be a bug, so I post it here. Apologize if it's
not appropriate.
I have a file p.zip, there is a __main__.py in it, and the content of
__main__.py is:
from multiprocessing import Process
import
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 08:16, Chris Withers wrote:
> What's the general consensus on supporting Python 2.5 nowadays?
>
> Do people still have to use this in commercial environments or is
> everyone on 2.6+ nowadays?
This seems rather off-topic for python-dev.
FWIW, on Gentoo we're just now gett
> Do people still have to use this in commercial environments or is
> everyone on 2.6+ nowadays?
RHEL 5.7 ships with Python 2.4.3. So no, not everybody is on 2.6+
today, and this won't happen before a couple years.
cf
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 07:16:06AM +, Chris Withers wrote:
> What's the general consensus on supporting Python 2.5 nowadays?
>
> Do people still have to use this in commercial environments
I have to use it. There is a rather large and complex intranet site
with both 32- and 64-bit versions
On Dec 21, 2011, at 07:16 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
>What's the general consensus on supporting Python 2.5 nowadays?
FWIW, Ubuntu dropped 2.5 quite a while ago. The next LTS (long term support)
release in April 2012 will have only Python 2.7 (and 3.2). The currently
in-development next Debian re
On 21 Dec 2011, at 12:42, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Dec 21, 2011, at 07:16 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
>
>> What's the general consensus on supporting Python 2.5 nowadays?
>
> FWIW, Ubuntu dropped 2.5 quite a while ago. The next LTS (long term support)
> release in April 2012 will have only Python
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 07:16:06 +
Chris Withers wrote:
> What's the python-dev view on this?
Python 2.5 is not supported by *us* anymore (*). Anyone still using it
therefore relies on their OS vendor to apply potential security
patches and other important fixes.
Library authors can of course ch
I am still working on projects based on Python2.4 in commercial
environments (limitation of OS: Solaris 5.10). And I don't think this will
be changed soon..
2011/12/21 Michael Foord
>
> On 21 Dec 2011, at 12:42, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>
> > On Dec 21, 2011, at 07:16 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
> >
>
Michael Foord wrote:
> On 21 Dec 2011, at 12:42, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> >
> > FWIW, Ubuntu dropped 2.5 quite a while ago. The next LTS (long term
> > support) release in April 2012 will have only Python 2.7 (and 3.2).
True, but 2.5 is still current on Hardy, an LTS release that is officially
su
I believe most AppEngine applications in Python are still using 2.5
run-time. So are development boxes for these applications. It may take
another year or two for the transition.
--
anatoly t.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
> What's the python-dev view on this?
>
> -
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Leo Jay wrote:
> It seems that the situation described here is similar:
> http://bugs.python.org/issue10128
>
> But the patch doesn't work for me.
>
> Anybody knows how to fix this?
Try the patch from http://bugs.python.org/issue10845 (the one on
#10128 only parti
On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 10:42 +0100, Charles-François Natali wrote:
> > Do people still have to use this in commercial environments or is
> > everyone on 2.6+ nowadays?
>
> RHEL 5.7 ships with Python 2.4.3. So no, not everybody is on 2.6+
> today, and this won't happen before a couple years.
(and R
FWIW, the most recent version of pywin32 has the following download
counts (rounded to the nearest thousand)
Version 32bit 64bit
-
3.2 - 75,000 9,000
3.1 - 4,000 1,000
2.7 - 126,000 16,000
2.6 - 46,000 6,000
2.5 - 21,000 n/a
2.4 -
I have some features I need to add to lib2to3 to make it more useful for
our purposes at work supporting our massive code base in a Python 2 to 3
transition. Which tree should I develop these and check these into?
cpython/default?
Can I backport this to 3.2 and 2.7? It counts as a feature additi
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 21:32:44 +
> Mark Shannon wrote:
> >
> > > per-instance attributes, it just forces them all to keep resizing up,
> > > even though individual instances would be small with the current dict.
> > There is a cut-off po
On 22 Dec 2011, at 01:25, Mark Hammond wrote:
> FWIW, the most recent version of pywin32 has the following download counts
> (rounded to the nearest thousand)
>
> Version 32bit 64bit
> -
> 3.2 - 75,000 9,000
> 3.1 - 4,000 1,000
> 2.7 - 126,000 1
What's the general consensus on supporting Python 2.5 nowadays?
There is no such consensus :-)
Do people still have to use this in commercial environments or is
everyone on 2.6+ nowadays?
At work, we are still using Python 2.5. Six months ago, we started a
project to upgrade to 2.7, but we
On 21/12/2011 15:26, anatoly techtonik wrote:
I believe most AppEngine applications in Python are still using 2.5
run-time. So are development boxes for these applications. It may take
another year or two for the transition.
App engine 1.6 improved support of Python 2.7, so I hope that -slowly-
2011/12/21 Gregory P. Smith :
> I have some features I need to add to lib2to3 to make it more useful for our
> purposes at work supporting our massive code base in a Python 2 to 3
> transition. Which tree should I develop these and check these into?
>
> cpython/default?
>
> Can I backport this to 3
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 01:49:37 +
Michael Foord wrote:
> These figures can't possibly be true. No-one is using Python 3 yet. ;-)
Since you brought it up. Is anyone paying people (or trying to hire
people) to write Python 3?
Thanks,
http://www.mired.org/
Independent
I'm paid to write Python3. I've also been writing Python3 for hobby
projects since mid 2010. I'm on the verge of going back to 2.7 due to
compatibility issues :(
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Mike Meyer wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 01:49:37 +
> Michael Foord wrote:
>> These figures can't
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 02:49:06AM +0100, Victor Stinner wrote:
>
> >Do people still have to use this in commercial environments or is
> >everyone on 2.6+ nowadays?
>
> At work, we are still using Python 2.5. Six months ago, we started a
> project to upgrade to 2.7, but we have now more urgent ta
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 4:49 AM, Michael Foord wrote:
>
> On 22 Dec 2011, at 01:25, Mark Hammond wrote:
>
> > FWIW, the most recent version of pywin32 has the following download
> counts (rounded to the nearest thousand)
> >
> > Version 32bit 64bit
> > -
> > 3.2 - 75
24 matches
Mail list logo
