On 24/09/2012 07:18, Georg Brandl wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On behalf of the Python development team, I'm delighted to announce the
third release candidate of Python 3.3.0.
This is a preview release, and its use is not recommended in
production settings.
Python 3.3 i
Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 24/09/2012 07:18, Georg Brandl wrote:
[snip impressive list of improvements]
Yes, but apart from all that, what have the python devs ever done for
us? Nothing :)
I'll take that kind of nothing any day of the week! ;)
~Ethan~
__
Hello,
I was wondering if it would be worth providing better HTTP 1.1 support
in http.server. The way I envision it, there would be a separate
HTTP11RequestHandler which would provide:
- a smart wfile with automatic chunk encoding (which relieves the API
user from manually handling chunk encod
Am 24.09.2012 17:27, schrieb Antoine Pitrou:
>
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering if it would be worth providing better HTTP 1.1 support
> in http.server. The way I envision it, there would be a separate
> HTTP11RequestHandler which would provide:
>
> - a smart wfile with automatic chunk encoding (whi
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Christian Heimes wrote:
> You proposed gave me another idea. What do you think about SPDY support
> in the stdlib? It's the next step after HTTP 1.1.
I'd wait it out a bit. SPDY is currently iterating, and there's an
effort to define HTTP 2 that will likely supers
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Christian Heimes wrote:
>
> +1 for 3.4
>
> You proposed gave me another idea. What do you think about SPDY support
> in the stdlib? It's the next step after HTTP 1.1.
Yeah, it is a good idea. it should live along side with HTTP 1.1 as
another protocol layer.
Guido
+1 for 3.4
And I'll be available to help with HTTP(websockets and SPDY) related stuff!
2012/9/24 Senthil Kumaran
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Christian Heimes
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 for 3.4
> >
> > You proposed gave me another idea. What do you think about SPDY support
> > in the stdlib?
