On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Raymond Hettinger
raymond.hettin...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll look at this in more detail after I've finishing my review of the
TransformDict,
but my initial impression is that the original show stopper hasn't been
overcome:
http://bugs.python.org/issue10977
The
On 21 Oct 2013 12:44, Raymond Hettinger raymond.hettin...@gmail.com
wrote:
Two of the new context managers in contextlib are now wrapped in
pass-through factory functions. The intent is to make the help() look
cleaner. This practice does have downsides however.
The usual way to detect
On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 19:49:24 -0700, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
On 10/20/2013 07:42 PM, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
In short, I recommend that efforts be directed at improving help() rather
than limiting introspection by way of less clean coding practices.
+1
I'm also +1 on
On 21 October 2013 11:59, R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com wrote:
On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 19:49:24 -0700, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
On 10/20/2013 07:42 PM, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
In short, I recommend that efforts be directed at improving help() rather
than limiting
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 12:11:57 +0100, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 October 2013 11:59, R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com wrote:
On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 19:49:24 -0700, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
On 10/20/2013 07:42 PM, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
In short, I
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 07:21:11 -0400, R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com
wrote:
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 12:11:57 +0100, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 October 2013 11:59, R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com wrote:
On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 19:49:24 -0700, Ethan Furman
On 21 Oct 2013 21:22, R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com wrote:
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 12:11:57 +0100, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 21 October 2013 11:59, R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com wrote:
On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 19:49:24 -0700, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us
wrote:
Le Mon, 21 Oct 2013 20:46:39 +1000,
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com a écrit :
On 21 Oct 2013 12:44, Raymond Hettinger
raymond.hettin...@gmail.com wrote:
Two of the new context managers in contextlib are now wrapped in
pass-through factory functions. The intent is to make the help() look
Le Mon, 21 Oct 2013 23:12:40 +1000,
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com a écrit :
On 21 Oct 2013 22:10, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Le Mon, 21 Oct 2013 20:46:39 +1000,
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com a écrit :
On 21 Oct 2013 12:44, Raymond Hettinger
On Oct 21, 2013, at 08:46 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
There's also the fact that I prefer the current lower case names, but
strongly dislike using lower case names for classes (despite the fact
closing was included in the original contextlib with a non PEP 8 compliant
class name).
Ha! The only
On Oct 21, 2013, at 08:46 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
There's also the fact that I prefer the current lower case names, but
strongly dislike using lower case names for classes (despite the fact
closing was included in the original contextlib with a non PEP 8 compliant
class name).
I think PEP 8
This is a reminder that Python 2.6.9 final - and by that I mean *really* final
as it will be the last supported version of Python 2.6 - is scheduled for
release one week from today, on October 28, 2013.
All known showstopper security bugs have been applied to the branch. If you
know of anything
On 21 Oct 2013 23:54, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Le Mon, 21 Oct 2013 23:12:40 +1000,
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com a écrit :
On 21 Oct 2013 22:10, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Le Mon, 21 Oct 2013 20:46:39 +1000,
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com a écrit :
I may be missing something, but it seems the Python tarballs and hashes are
on the same host, and this is not an entirely good thing for security.
The way things are now, an attacker breaks into one host, doctors up a
tarball, changes the hashes in the same host, and people download without
On Oct 21, 2013, at 06:21 PM, Dan Stromberg wrote:
I may be missing something, but it seems the Python tarballs and hashes are
on the same host, and this is not an entirely good thing for security.
All the tarballs are signed with the GPG keys of the release managers. The
hashes are just a
On 22 October 2013 12:21, Dan Stromberg drsali...@gmail.com wrote:
I may be missing something, but it seems the Python tarballs and hashes
are on the same host, and this is not an entirely good thing for security.
The way things are now, an attacker breaks into one host, doctors up a
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Tim Delaney timothy.c.dela...@gmail.comwrote:
On 22 October 2013 12:21, Dan Stromberg drsali...@gmail.com wrote:
I may be missing something, but it seems the Python tarballs and hashes
are on the same host, and this is not an entirely good thing for security.
I know that many core devs subscribe to the new tracker issues list. If
you skipped over
http://bugs.python.org/issue19335
because it was (mis) titled as an Idle issue (as I presume most would),
you might want to reconsider as it is actually a code and in particular,
a codeop issue. Consider
18 matches
Mail list logo
