On 2 November 2013 08:44, Eric Snow wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>> Thanks for the clarification. It all SGTM.
>
> I've updated the PEP and the reference implementation.
While I was saying loader when I should have been saying finder, Eric
correctly divined my in
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 5:46 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 2 November 2013 08:44, Eric Snow wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> >> Thanks for the clarification. It all SGTM.
> >
> > I've updated the PEP and the reference implementation.
>
> While I was saying loader
On 3 November 2013 01:21, Brett Cannon wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 5:46 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> For the same reason, I also have a mild preference for "target" (or
>> the more explicit "load_target") as the name, although I won't object
>> if you and Brett prefer "existing".
>
> I would go
In article <3dbmq94f4bz7...@mail.python.org>,
jason.coombs wrote:
> http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/7d399099334d
> changeset: 86861:7d399099334d
> branch: 3.2
> user:Jason R. Coombs
> date:Sat Nov 02 13:00:01 2013 -0400
> summary:
> Update NEWS for 265d369ad3b9.
>
> f
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Eric: since "target" was on both Brett's list and mine, it looks like
> s/existing/target/ and clarifying that "incompatible target module"
> should be reported by throwing ImportError from find_spec() will get
> you the pronouncement you're lo
