On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Larry Hastings wrote:
>
> It's my contention that "nullable" is the correct name. But I've been asked
> to bring up the topic for discussion, to see if a consensus forms around
> this or around some other name.
>
> Let the bike-shedding begin,
>
>
> /arry
+1 for
Am 04.08.14 09:12, schrieb Larry Hastings:
> It's my contention that "nullable" is the correct name. But I've been
> asked to bring up the topic for discussion, to see if a consensus forms
> around this or around some other name.
I have personally no problems with calling a type "nullable" even i
