On 13 Sep 2014 10:18, "Jeff Allen" wrote:
> 4. I think (with Antoine) if Jython supported PEP-383 byte smuggling, it
would have to do it the same way as CPython, as it is visible. It's not
impossible (I think), but is messy. Some are strongly against.
It may be worth trying *without* it (i.e. tre
On Sat, 13 Sep 2014 21:06:21 +1200, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 13 Sep 2014 10:18, "Jeff Allen" wrote:
> > 4. I think (with Antoine) if Jython supported PEP-383 byte smuggling, it
> would have to do it the same way as CPython, as it is visible. It's not
> impossible (I think), but is messy. Some are
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014, 09:33 R. David Murray wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Sep 2014 21:06:21 +1200, Nick Coghlan
> wrote:
> > On 13 Sep 2014 10:18, "Jeff Allen" wrote:
> > > 4. I think (with Antoine) if Jython supported PEP-383 byte smuggling,
> it
> > would have to do it the same way as CPython, as it is
On 14 Sep 2014 01:33, "R. David Murray" wrote:
>
> On Sat, 13 Sep 2014 21:06:21 +1200, Nick Coghlan
wrote:
> > On 13 Sep 2014 10:18, "Jeff Allen" wrote:
> > > 4. I think (with Antoine) if Jython supported PEP-383 byte smuggling,
it
> > would have to do it the same way as CPython, as it is visibl
