On 27 November 2014 at 11:15, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 Nov 2014 06:35, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
[...]
I think we can put a number to much faster now -- 150 nsec per
try/except.
On 27 November 2014 at 09:50, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
This is actually the second iteration of this bug: the original
implementation *always* suppressed StopIteration. PJE caught that one before
Python 2.5
http://bugs.python.org/issue20530#msg231584
--
Jesús Cea Avión _/_/ _/_/_/_/_/_/
j...@jcea.es - http://www.jcea.es/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/
Twitter: @jcea_/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/_/
jabber / xmpp:j...@jabber.org _/_/
2014-11-27 13:28 GMT+01:00 Jesus Cea j...@jcea.es:
http://bugs.python.org/issue20530#msg231584
Copy/paste of the message:
Preparing a presentation about Python Magic methods I found something
weird: (Python 3.4)
help(int.__lt__)
Help on wrapper_descriptor:
__lt__(self, value, /) - THIS!!
2014-11-27 13:41 GMT+01:00 Victor Stinner victor.stin...@gmail.com:
2014-11-27 13:28 GMT+01:00 Jesus Cea j...@jcea.es:
http://bugs.python.org/issue20530#msg231584
Copy/paste of the message:
Preparing a presentation about Python Magic methods I found something
weird: (Python 3.4)
2014-11-27 13:41 GMT+01:00 Victor Stinner victor.stin...@gmail.com:
I am amused about the /) suffix in the signature. It happens to all
magic methods.
If I remember correctly, it means that the function does not accept keywords:
(3).__lt__(4)
True
(3).__lt__(value=4)
Traceback (most recent
On 27/11/14 13:42, Victor Stinner wrote:
2014-11-27 13:41 GMT+01:00 Victor Stinner victor.stin...@gmail.com:
I am amused about the /) suffix in the signature. It happens to all
magic methods.
If I remember correctly, it means that the function does not accept keywords:
I don't understand.
On 27 November 2014 at 23:43, Jesus Cea j...@jcea.es wrote:
On 27/11/14 13:42, Victor Stinner wrote:
2014-11-27 13:41 GMT+01:00 Victor Stinner victor.stin...@gmail.com:
I am amused about the /) suffix in the signature. It happens to all
magic methods.
If I remember correctly, it means that
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 3:04 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 November 2014 at 11:15, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 27 Nov 2014 06:35, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
[...]
Hi,
I'm trying to follow the discussion about the PEP 479 (Change
StopIteration handling inside generators), but it's hard to read all
messages. I'm concerned by trollius and asyncio which heavily rely on
StopIteration.
Trollius currently supports running asyncio coroutines: a trollius
coroutine
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Victor Stinner victor.stin...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm trying to follow the discussion about the PEP 479 (Change
StopIteration handling inside generators), but it's hard to read all
messages. I'm concerned by trollius and asyncio which heavily rely on
2014-11-27 20:06 GMT+01:00 Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org:
The issue here is that asyncio only interprets StopIteration as returning
from the generator (with a possible value),
I'm not sure that the issue is directly related to asyncio.
trollius_coro() raises a StopIteration to return the
2014-11-27 22:54 GMT+01:00 Victor Stinner victor.stin...@gmail.com:
I don't see how it would work.
If it cannot be fixed, would it make sense to allow trollius to
continue to work as it currently works with something like from
__past__ import generator_dont_stop?
When I talked with a friend
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Victor Stinner
victor.stin...@gmail.com wrote:
def return_value(value):
if 0:
yield
raise Return(value)
This is one known significant backward-incompatibility issue with this
PEP - it'll be difficult to make this work on Python 2.7, where
On 28 November 2014 at 02:52, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 3:04 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
If compatibility with older Python versions is needed, then you could
put something like the following in a compatibility module:
try:
On 28 November 2014 at 08:09, Victor Stinner victor.stin...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-11-27 22:54 GMT+01:00 Victor Stinner victor.stin...@gmail.com:
I don't see how it would work.
If it cannot be fixed, would it make sense to allow trollius to
continue to work as it currently works with something
16 matches
Mail list logo
