On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 at 09:10 R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 15:59:23 -, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 at 23:19 Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 August 2015 at 05:52, Gregory P. Smith g...@krypto.org wrote:
Pardon me if I'm not in the right place to ask the following naive
question. (say me if it's the case)
Does Profile Guided Optimization performance improvements are specific to
the chip where the built is done or the performance is better on a larger
set of chips?
On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 13:11:37 -, Papa, Florin florin.p...@intel.com
wrote:
My name is Florin Papa and I work in the Server Languages Optimizations Team
at Intel Corporation.
I would like to submit a patch that solves compatibility issues of the
django_v2 benchmark in the Grand Unified
Hi Armin,
On 25.08.2015 12:51, Armin Rigo wrote:
Hi Valentine,
On 24 August 2015 at 20:43, Valentine Sinitsyn
valentine.sinit...@gmail.com wrote:
So you mean that this was to keep things backwards compatible for
third-party extensions? I haven't thought about it this way, but this makes
Hi Armin,
On 25.08.2015 13:00, Armin Rigo wrote:
Hi Valentine,
On 25 August 2015 at 09:56, Valentine Sinitsyn
valentine.sinit...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I think so. There is a *highly obscure* corner case: __del__
will still be called several times if you declare your class with
__slots__=().
Hi All,
My name is Florin Papa and I work in the Server Languages Optimizations Team at
Intel Corporation.
I would like to submit a patch that solves compatibility issues of the
django_v2 benchmark in the Grand Unified Python Benchmark. The django_v2
benchmark uses inspect.getargspec(), which
On 8/25/2015 10:51 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 13:11:37 -, Papa, Florin florin.p...@intel.com
wrote:
My name is Florin Papa and I work in the Server Languages Optimizations Team at
Intel Corporation.
I would like to submit a patch that solves compatibility issues of
On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 11:18:54 -0400, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
On 8/25/2015 10:51 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 13:11:37 -, Papa, Florin florin.p...@intel.com
wrote:
My name is Florin Papa and I work in the Server Languages Optimizations
Team at Intel
On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 at 08:31 R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 11:18:54 -0400, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
On 8/25/2015 10:51 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 13:11:37 -, Papa, Florin
florin.p...@intel.com wrote:
My name is
PGO is unrelated to the particular CPU the profiling is done on. (It is
conceivable that it'd make a small difference but I've never observed that
in practice)
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015, 9:28 AM Xavier Combelle xavier.combe...@gmail.com
wrote:
Pardon me if I'm not in the right place to ask the
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 at 23:19 Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 August 2015 at 05:52, Gregory P. Smith g...@krypto.org wrote:
What we tested and decided to use on our own builds after benchmarking at
work was to build with:
make profile-opt PROFILE_TASK=-m test.regrtest -w
On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 15:59:23 -, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 at 23:19 Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 August 2015 at 05:52, Gregory P. Smith g...@krypto.org wrote:
What we tested and decided to use on our own builds after benchmarking at
work
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015, 11:19 PM Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 August 2015 at 05:52, Gregory P. Smith g...@krypto.org wrote:
What we tested and decided to use on our own builds after benchmarking at
work was to build with:
make profile-opt PROFILE_TASK=-m test.regrtest -w
Indeed, as Gregory well mentioned, PGO is unrelated to a particular CPU on
which we do profiling.
From: Python-Dev
[mailto:python-dev-bounces+alecsandru.patrascu=intel@python.org] On Behalf
Of Gregory P. Smith
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 7:44 PM
To: Xavier Combelle;
On 8/25/2015 2:17 PM, Steve Dower wrote:
I've written up a long technical blog post about the compiler and CRT
changes in Python 3.5, which will be of interest to those who build and
distribute native extensions for Windows.
http://stevedower.id.au/blog/building-for-python-3-5/
Hopefully it
Hi Valentine,
On 24 August 2015 at 20:43, Valentine Sinitsyn
valentine.sinit...@gmail.com wrote:
So you mean that this was to keep things backwards compatible for
third-party extensions? I haven't thought about it this way, but this makes
sense. However, the behavior of Python code using
On 25 August 2015 at 05:52, Gregory P. Smith g...@krypto.org wrote:
What we tested and decided to use on our own builds after benchmarking at
work was to build with:
make profile-opt PROFILE_TASK=-m test.regrtest -w -uall,-audio -x test_gdb
test_multiprocessing
In general if a test is
Hi Valentine,
On 25 August 2015 at 09:56, Valentine Sinitsyn
valentine.sinit...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I think so. There is a *highly obscure* corner case: __del__
will still be called several times if you declare your class with
__slots__=().
Even on post-PEP-0442 Python 3.4+? Could you
I've written up a long technical blog post about the compiler and CRT
changes in Python 3.5, which will be of interest to those who build and
distribute native extensions for Windows.
http://stevedower.id.au/blog/building-for-python-3-5/
Hopefully it puts some of the changes we've made into a
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
With a `make develop` target we also can make sure not only that
--with-pydebug is used but that the installation target is /tmp so that new
contributors don't accidentally install a debug build.
You need to be careful
On behalf of the Python development community and the Python 3.5 release
team, I'm relieved to announce the availability of Python 3.5.0rc2, also
known as Python 3.5.0 Release Candidate 2.
Python 3.5 has now entered feature freeze. By default new features
may no longer be added to Python
On Aug 24, 2015 3:51 PM, Stewart, David C david.c.stew...@intel.com
wrote:
(Sorry about the format here - I honestly just subscribed to Python-dev so
be gentle ...)
:)
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2015 11:25:59 -0600
From: Eric Snow ericsnowcurren...@gmail.com
On Aug 22, 2015 9:02 AM, Patrascu,
Interesting. So pypy (with it's profiling JIT) would be in a similar boat,
potentially.
PGO and what pypy does have pretty much nothing to do with each other.
I'm not sure what do you mean by similar boat
___
Python-Dev mailing list
23 matches
Mail list logo
