Re: [Python-Dev] Building Extensions for Python 3.5 on Windows

On 02Sep2015 0803, Paul Moore wrote: On 2 September 2015 at 14:07, Steve Dower wrote: You can also build existing object or static libraries into their own DLL with the old compiler and dynamically link to them. It's not perfect, but it's no worse than trying to link

Re: [Python-Dev] What's New editing

On 2015-07-06 11:38 AM, David Mertz wrote: Hi Folks, I hereby volunteer to write "What's New for Python 3.5?" if folks on python-dev are fine with me taking the job (i.e. I ran it by Travis, my boss at Continuum, and he's happy to allow me to do that work within my salaried hours... so

Re: [Python-Dev] python programmer

In a word, No. Try https://www.python.org/jobs/ On 02/09/15 21:57, Linda Ryan wrote: Dear Admin, I am an IT/Project Management recruiter looking to increase the available pool of talent for available job placements. Currently I have an opening for a python programmer/developer. Could I post

Re: [Python-Dev] python programmer

On 09/02/2015 02:53 PM, Mark Shannon wrote: On 02/09/15 21:57, Linda Ryan wrote: Could I post opportunities to your member list? In a word, No. Try https://www.python.org/jobs/ But thank you for asking first. :) Good luck! -- ~Ethan~ ___

Re: [Python-Dev] python programmer

On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Linda Ryan wrote: > I am an IT/Project Management recruiter looking to increase the available > pool of talent for available job placements. > Currently I have an opening for a python programmer/developer. Could I post > opportunities to

[Python-Dev] python programmer

Dear Admin, I am an IT/Project Management recruiter looking to increase the available pool of talent for available job placements. Currently I have an opening for a python programmer/developer. Could I post opportunities to your member list? Thank you, Linda Ryan Business Development Manager

Re: [Python-Dev] Building Extensions for Python 3.5 on Windows

On 1 September 2015 at 17:15, Steve Dower wrote: > On 01Sep2015 0747, Oscar Benjamin wrote: >> >> Thanks for the detailed writeup Steve. Do you know how these changes >> to the python.org Windows binaries would impact on people building >> extension modules with MinGW? > >

Re: [Python-Dev] Building Extensions for Python 3.5 on Windows

On 2 September 2015 at 13:01, Carl Kleffner wrote: > that is https://bugs.python.org/msg248716 see also > http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=3390=guest=guest Interesting. But it does confirm that object files have to be rebuilt, and there's no way to use existing

Re: [Python-Dev] Building Extensions for Python 3.5 on Windows

You can also build existing object or static libraries into their own DLL with the old compiler and dynamically link to them. It's not perfect, but it's no worse than trying to link them in directly. Otherwise, your analysis is correct. The OpenSSL issue was because they directly referred to

Re: [Python-Dev] Building Extensions for Python 3.5 on Windows

Hi, that is https://bugs.python.org/msg248716 see also http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=3390=guest=guest Steve: is there more of that in the new universal runtimes? Carl 2015-09-02 12:16 GMT+02:00 Paul Moore : > On 1 September 2015 at 17:15, Steve Dower

Re: [Python-Dev] Building Extensions for Python 3.5 on Windows

There are more semantic surprises as well. Some Math functions like powf, acosf and so on are available only with the help of the VS 2015 math.h include file (32 bit case). With exporting symbols names from the universal dll's and creating import libraries you are not done yet. Carl 2015-09-02

Re: [Python-Dev] Building Extensions for Python 3.5 on Windows

On 2 September 2015 at 14:07, Steve Dower wrote: > You can also build existing object or static libraries into their own DLL > with the old compiler and dynamically link to them. It's not perfect, but > it's no worse than trying to link them in directly. Interesting