(Apologies for reviving a dead horse, but may not be around at the blessed
time.)
As potential names of this concept, I liked record and row, but agreed they were
a bit too specific and not quite exact. In my recent (unrelated) reading
however, I came across another term and think it might fi
On 12 October 2017 at 06:33, Mike Miller wrote:
> (Apologies for reviving a dead horse, but may not be around at the blessed
> time.)
>
> As potential names of this concept, I liked record and row, but agreed
> they were a bit too specific and not quite exact. In my recent (unrelated)
> reading
On 2017-10-11 19:56, Nick Coghlan wrote:
From my perspective, the main benefit of a compound name like "data class" is
that it emphasises a deliberate behavioural choice (adopted from attrs): data
classes are just regular classes, with some definition time logic to help define
data fields.
On 12 October 2017 at 14:49, Mike Miller wrote:
>
> On 2017-10-11 19:56, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
>> From my perspective, the main benefit of a compound name like "data
>> class" is that it emphasises a deliberate behavioural choice (adopted from
>> attrs): data classes are just regular classes, wi
