Le jeu. 28 mars 2019 à 05:27, Stephen J. Turnbull
a écrit :
> Victor Stinner writes:
>
> > I just fixed the mojibake issue in Python 3.8 by disabling C locale
> > coercion and UTF-8 Mode by default. I'm not sure if nor how Python 3.7
> > should be fixed in a minor 3.7.x release.
>
> That sounds
On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 15:59:25 -0700
"Gregory P. Smith" wrote:
>
> That had a C++ stack trace 1000+ levels deep repeating the pattern of
>
> ...
> @ 0x564d59bd21de 32 func_dealloc
> @ 0x564d59bce0c1 32 cell_dealloc
> @ 0x564d5839db41 48 tupledeall
On 2019-03-28 01:38, Tim Peters wrote:
The bad news is that the traschcan mechanism is excruciating, a
long-time source of subtle bugs of its own :-(
It just happens that I created a PR to fix some of the trashcan
problems: see https://bugs.python.org/issue35983 and
https://github.com/python/
On 27.03.2019 20:48, Victor Stinner wrote:
Hi,
I would like to add a new C API to initialize Python. I would like
your opinion on the whole API before making it public. The code is
already implemented. Doc of the new API:
https://pythondev.readthedocs.io/init_config.html
To make the API
Le mer. 27 mars 2019 à 21:26, Brett Cannon a écrit :
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 12:39 PM Steve Dower wrote:
>> I this this should be its own PEP, since as you say it is not
>> implementing the only PEP we have (or alternatively, maybe you should
>> collaborate to update PEP 432 so that it reflects
On 28Mar2019 0703, Victor Stinner wrote:
In fact, there is already a PyConfig._init_config flag (currently
named _PyCoreConfig._init_main) which only initializes Python up to
the "core initialization" if set to 0. This parameter is private since
it's unclear to me what should be the exact scope o
Hi everyone,
We have submitted PEP 570 for consideration to the steering council:
https://github.com/python/steering-council/issues/4
The discussion is happening on discourse:
https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-570-python-positional-only-parameters/1078
To eliminate splitting the discussion into
Hi Python developers,
Victor suggested I post a little background to help the maintainers understand
VxWorks a little better.
It can be found here
https://github.com/Wind-River/cpython/wiki/Python-on-VxWorks
If you'd like more detail in a particular area, please feel free to reply on or
off list.
On 2019-03-28, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 15:59:25 -0700
> "Gregory P. Smith" wrote:
> >
> > That had a C++ stack trace 1000+ levels deep repeating the pattern of
> >
> > ...
> > @ 0x564d59bd21de 32 func_dealloc
> > @ 0x564d59bce0c1 32 cell_deal
Hi all
Time is short, but I'm hoping to get PEP 578 (formerly PEP 551) into
Python 3.8. Here's the current text for review and comment before I
submit to the Steering Council.
The formatted text is at https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0578/
(update just pushed, so give it an hour or so, bu
The implementation can be viewed as a PR at
https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/12613
On 28Mar2019 1535, Steve Dower wrote:
Hi all
Time is short, but I'm hoping to get PEP 578 (formerly PEP 551) into
Python 3.8. Here's the current text for review and comment before I
submit to the Steerin
Hi,
I read quickly the PEP, I'm not sure that I understood it correctly,
so here are some early questions more about the usage of the PEP, than
its implementation.
> This is not sandboxing, as this proposal does not attempt to prevent
> malicious behavior (though it enables some new options to do
A proponent writes:
> We have submitted PEP 570 for consideration to the steering
> council:
I would like to ask *future* proponents to please include the title
explicitly in the first mention. (This is not a criticism of the
previous post. How could he know I would write this?)
In this case
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 11:11 PM Stephen J. Turnbull <
turnbull.stephen...@u.tsukuba.ac.jp> wrote:
> >
> https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-570-Python-Positional-Only-Parameters/1078
>
> (sorry, case changed for emphasis so clicking won't work)
>
Clicking actually did work for me. Not only is that
On 2019-03-29 04:08, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
In this case, it's here:
> https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-570-Python-Positional-Only-Parameters/1078
So, are we supposed to discuss PEPs on discuss.python.org now? That's
fine for me, should I create a thread like that for PEP 580 too?
15 matches
Mail list logo
