I am creating this post as a courtesy to anyone interested in python's tokenize
module.
**tl;dr:** Various posts, linked below, discuss a much better replacement for
untokenize. Do with it as you will.
This code is very unlikely to be buggy. *Please* let me know if you find
problems with it.
On 11/3/2019 11:12 AM, Edward K. Ream wrote:
I am creating this post as a courtesy to anyone interested in python's tokenize
module.
As one of the 46 contributors to this module, and as one who fixed
several untokenize bugs a few years ago, I am interested.
> **tl;dr:** Various posts, linke
On Sun, Nov 3, 2019 at 4:14 PM Terry Reedy wrote:
> > **tl;dr:** Various posts, linked below, discuss a much better
replacement for untokenize.
> If that were true, I would be interested. But as explained below, I
don't believe it.
I do not believe that the tone of my post was in any way objec