there are stat fields now for ns precision, e.g. st_mtime now has an
analogue st_mtime_ns. But os.path didn't grow corresponding methods -
there's an os.path.getmtime but not _ms. Was that intentional? The
wrappers in genericpath.py are trivial and arguably aren't particularly
needed, but
Are there any filesystems that can actually record a meaningful ns
modification time? I find discussions claiming this:
- XFS and EXT3: second precision
- EXT4: millisecond precision
- NTFS: 100ns precision
- APFS: 1 ns precision
But also notes that the precision is likely to exceed the accuracy
I suspect a bug. Can you report on bugs.python.org and CC me?
On Sun, Dec 6, 2020 at 10:16 PM Paul Bryan wrote:
> Is this the expected behavior?
>
> Python 3.9.0 (default, Oct 7 2020, 23:09:01)
>
> [GCC 10.2.0] on linux
>
> Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
If the precision is available via OS APIs, this is mostly an issue+PR away
from being implemented by someone who cares.
FAT32 has a two billion nanosecond resolution IIRC. :P
-gps
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 8:22 AM David Mertz wrote:
> Are there any filesystems that can actually record a meaningfu
On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 16:19:02 +
David Mertz wrote:
> Are there any filesystems that can actually record a meaningful ns
> modification time? I find discussions claiming this:
>
> - XFS and EXT3: second precision
> - EXT4: millisecond precision
> - NTFS: 100ns precision
> - APFS: 1 ns precision
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 10:52 AM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 16:19:02 +
> David Mertz wrote:
> > Are there any filesystems that can actually record a meaningful ns
> > modification time? I find discussions claiming this:
> >
> > - XFS and EXT3: second precision
> > - EXT4: mil
After much deliberation, the 2020 SC will be making a recommendation to the
2021 SC to accept PEP 634 (although this was not a unanimous decision).
This is in no way a binding recommendation to the 2021 SC (even if a
majority of current council members get re-elected), but we felt we should
pass on
Le lun. 7 déc. 2020 à 17:22, David Mertz a écrit :
> Are there any filesystems that can actually record a meaningful ns
> modification time? I find discussions claiming this:
>
> EXT4: millisecond precision
EXT4 and BTRFS have a resolution of 1 nanosecond.
> XFS and EXT3: second precision
XFS
On 12/7/20 11:29 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
After much deliberation, the 2020 SC will be making a recommendation to the 2021 SC to accept PEP 634 (although this was
not a unanimous decision).
This seems very odd. The Steering Council is elected to make decisions, but it feels like the current SC
Le lun. 7 déc. 2020 à 19:52, Antoine Pitrou a écrit :
> > But also notes that the precision is likely to exceed the accuracy by many
> > times on real systems.
>
> Even if the accuracy is much lower than that, it can be important to
> reproduce exact timestamps.
Sure, while my initial attempt to
This opens the door for people voting on A or B depending on if they would
accept or reject the PEP. Is this something we're willing to accept?
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 9:29 PM Ethan Furman via Python-Dev <
python-dev@python.org> wrote:
> On 12/7/20 11:29 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
> > After much de
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020, 22:34 Ethan Furman via Python-Dev <
python-dev@python.org> wrote:
> On 12/7/20 11:29 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
> > After much deliberation, the 2020 SC will be making a recommendation to
> the 2021 SC to accept PEP 634 (although this was
> > not a unanimous decision).
>
> This
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020, 23:10 Bernat Gabor wrote:
> This opens the door for people voting on A or B depending on if they would
> accept or reject the PEP. Is this something we're willing to accept?
>
The SC is, and I tried to make that clear in my earlier post about these
PEPs (
https://mail.python
It's starting to get very cold (at least on the Northern hemisphere) so we
have been carefully packaging a total of three new Python releases to keep
you warm these days!
Python 3.9.1 is the first maintenance release of Python 3.9, and also the
first version of Python to support macOS 11 Big Sur n
On 10/16/20 3:29 PM, Tal Einat wrote:
(Context: Continuing to prepare for the core dev sprint next week.
Since the sprint is near, *I'd greatly appreciate any quick comments,
feedback and ideas!*)
Following up my collection of past beginning contributor experiences,
I've collected these expe
15 matches
Mail list logo
