On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 10:36:10 +1100
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 06:17:09PM +0100, Victor Stinner wrote:
> > Hi Bernat,
> >
> > "stdlib_module_names" was my first idea but it looks too long, so I
> > chose "module_names". But someone on Twitter and now you asked me why
> > not
On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 23:05:07 +0100
Victor Stinner wrote:
>
> This is a different use case which requires a different solution.
> sys.module_names solve some specific use cases (that I listed in my
> first email).
>
> In Python 3.9, you can already check if a module __file__ is in the
>
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 12:44 AM Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 06:17:09PM +0100, Victor Stinner wrote:
> > Hi Bernat,
> >
> > "stdlib_module_names" was my first idea but it looks too long, so I
> > chose "module_names". But someone on Twitter and now you asked me why
> > not
If the length of the name is any kind of issue, since the stdlib
only contains modules (and packages), why not just sys.stdlib_names?
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 5:18 PM Victor Stinner wrote:
> Hi Bernat,
>
> "stdlib_module_names" was my first idea but it looks too long, so I
> chose
On 1/26/2021 8:32 PM, Steve Holden wrote:
If the length of the name is any kind of issue, since the stdlib
only contains modules (and packages), why not just sys.stdlib_names?
And since the modules can vary between platforms and builds, why
wouldn't this be sysconfig.stdlib_names rather than
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 1:26 AM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 10:36:10 +1100
> Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 06:17:09PM +0100, Victor Stinner wrote:
> > > Hi Bernat,
> > >
> > > "stdlib_module_names" was my first idea but it looks too long, so I
> > > chose
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 10:04 PM Steve Dower wrote:
>
> On 1/26/2021 8:32 PM, Steve Holden wrote:
> > If the length of the name is any kind of issue, since the stdlib
> > only contains modules (and packages), why not just sys.stdlib_names?
>
> And since the modules can vary between platforms and
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 10:23 PM Random832 wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021, at 18:44, Chris Jerdonek wrote:
> > But to issue a warning when a standard module is being overridden like
> > I was suggesting, wouldn’t you also need to know whether the name of
> > the module being imported is a
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 11:19:13PM +0100, Victor Stinner wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 10:04 PM Steve Dower wrote:
> >
> > On 1/26/2021 8:32 PM, Steve Holden wrote:
> > > If the length of the name is any kind of issue, since the stdlib
> > > only contains modules (and packages), why not just
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 12:08:03PM -0800, Brett Cannon wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 1:26 AM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
[...]
> > Disagreed. This is niche enough that it warrants a long but explicit
> > name, rather than some ambiguous shortcut.
> >
>
> I agree w/ Antoine that a more descriptive
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 10:56:57AM +0100, Victor Stinner wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 12:44 AM Steven D'Aprano wrote:
[...]
> > Your first instinct that it is too long is correct. Just call it
> > "stdlib" or "stdlib_names". The fact that it is a frozen set of module
> > names will be
11 matches
Mail list logo
