I just added the .name property to bz2.Bzip2File and added a test to verify
it. -- H
On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 at 21:40, Senthil Kumaran wrote:
> There is an open bug report https://bugs.python.org/issue24258
>
> I guess it was overlooked. It could be a good task for someone
> interested.
> Please
Hello Hasan,
Thank you. Please submit your patch as a PR in Github.
https://devguide.python.org/pullrequest/
Also, why did you have a self.filename and (getter?) as name. You could set
the attribute as name.
Thank you,
Senthil
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 12:32 AM Hasan Diwan wrote:
> I just added
I am new and I am just lurking here, so please pardon me if I say or do
anything out of place.
I saw your patch Mr. Diwan and I want to say that instead of making `filename`
attribute, it would be better to change it to `name`, just to adhere to
standards. And changing the name method to
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 3:25 PM Stestagg wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 10:31 PM Brett Cannon wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 9:37 AM Baptiste Carvello <
>> devel2...@baptiste-carvello.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> sorry for being late to the party, but I may not be the only
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 at 18:01, Brett Cannon wrote:
> Unfortunately I thought importlib.metadata would have used the module name
> instead of the metadata details, but in hindsight am guessing that the
> .dist-info is what it's using to do the lookup and that's based on the
> package name
[response inline]
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 at 04:55, Senthil Kumaran wrote:
> why did you have a self.filename and (getter?) as name. You could set the
> attribute as name.
>
I wasn't aware that this was an option. -- H
--
OpenPGP: https://hasan.d8u.us/openpgp.asc
If you wish to request my time,
Hi Barry,
After the feedback and seeing how busy the 3.10 release is being, I was not
expecting less. As mentioned, I have no rush in getting this through. Let's
put the right time into it.
I have been updating the PEP with the feedback you gave me and I expect to
get an updated version up before
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 10:51 PM Illia Volochii
wrote:
> There are a couple of uncompleted asyncio feature removals scheduled
> for 3.9 and 3.10 releases.
> It will be great if we either complete them or reschedule before the
> 3.10 feature freeze. There are two stale pull requests related
