"Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Josiah Carlson wrote:
> > According to wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin_alphabet),
> > various languages have adopted a transliteration of their language
> > and/or former alphabets into latin. They don't purport to know all of
> > the r
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> Not in the literal sense: you certainly want to allow
> "latin" digits in, say, a cyrillic identifier.
Yes, by "alphabet" I really only meant the letters,
although you might want to apply the same idea to
clusters of digits within an identifier, depending
on how potential
M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> If you are told to debug a program
> written by say a Japanese programmer using Japanese identifiers
> you are going to have a really hard time.
Or you could look upon it as an opportunity to
broaden your mental horizons by learning some
Japanese. :-)
--
Greg Ewing, Compu
After a few hours of tedious and frustrating hacking I've managed to
separate the Python abstract syntax tree parser from the rest of Python
itself. This could be useful for people who may wish to build Python
tools without Python, or tools in C/C++.
In the process of doing this, I came across
Josiah Carlson wrote:
> According to wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin_alphabet),
> various languages have adopted a transliteration of their language
> and/or former alphabets into latin. They don't purport to know all of
> the reasons why, and I'm not going to speculate.
>
> Whether
"Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Josiah Carlson wrote:
> > In this case it's not just a misreading, the characters look identical!
> > When is an 'E' not an 'E'? When it is an Epsilon or Ie. Saying what
> > characters will or will not be used as identifiers, when those
> > char
"Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> > You even argued against having non-ASCII identifiers:
> >
> > http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2002-May/102936.html
> >
> > Do you really think that it will help with code readability
> > if programmers are al
M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> You even argued against having non-ASCII identifiers:
>
> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2002-May/102936.html
I see :-) It seems I have changed my mind since then (which
apparently predates PEP 263).
One issue I apparently was worried about was the plan to us
I just switched the repository to read-only mode,
and removed the test subversion installation. I'll let
you know when the conversion is complete.
Regards,
Martin
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/p
Dear Lucky,
You are correct. Python 2.5 will have a conditional operator. The
syntax will be different than C; it will look like this:
(EXPR1 if TEST else EXPR2)
(which is the equivalent of TEST?EXPR1:EXPR2 in C). For more
information, see PEP 308 (http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0308.html).
P
Greg Ewing asked:
> Would it help if an identifier were required to be
> made up of letters from the same alphabet, e.g. all
> Latin or all Greek or all Cyrillic, but not a mixture.
Probably, yes, though there could still be problems
mixing within a program.
FWIW, the Opera web browser is alread
Guido writes:
> I find "AttributeError: __exit__" just as informative.
Eric Nieuwland responds:
> I see. Then why don't we unify *Error into Error?
> Just read the message and know what it means.
> And we could then drop the burden of exception classes and only use the
> message.
> A sense of deja
On 10/25/05, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul Moore wrote:
[...]
> > Has the option of letting the with statement admit multiple context
> > managers been considered (and presumably rejected)?
[...]
> Not rejected - deliberately left as a future option (this is the reason why
> the RH
Dear sir,
I m a student of Computer Science Dept.
University Of Pune.(M.S.) (India). We are learning
python as a course for our semester. Found its not
only use full but heart touching laguage.
Sir , I have found that the python is going
to have new feature, of "? " operato
Dear sir,
I m a student of Computer Science Dept.
University Of Pune.(M.S.) (India).
Sir , I have found that the python is about
to have feature of "? " operator same as in C languge.
Sir , Not Only I but the our whole Dept. is
waitng for it.
At 11:43 2005-10-24 +0200, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>Bengt Richter wrote:
>> Please bear with me for a few paragraphs ;-)
>
>Please note that source code encoding doesn't really have
>anything to do with the way the interpreter executes the
>program - it's merely a way to tell the parser how to
>conver
Paolino wrote:
> Is __hash__=id inside a class enough to use a set (sets.Set before 2.5)
> derived class instance as a key to a mapping?
It is __hash__=lambda self:id(self) that is terribly slow ,it needs a
faster way to state that to let them be useful as key to mapping as all
set operations w
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>
>>A few years ago we had a discussion about this on python-dev
>>and agreed to stick with ASCII identifiers for Python. I still
>>think that's the right way to go.
>
> I don't think there ever was such an agreement.
You even argued against having n
Am 25.10.2005 um 23:40 schrieb Josiah Carlson:
> [...]
> Identically drawn glyphs are a problem, and pretending that they
> aren't
> a problem, doesn't make it so. Right now, all possible name glyphs
> are
> visually distinct, which would not be the case if any unicode
> character
> could b
19 matches
Mail list logo
