Re: [Python-Dev] Fwd: Translating docs

2006-02-26 Thread Alexander Schremmer
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 08:50:57 +0100, Georg Brandl wrote: Martin: There aren't any German docs, are there? There is e.g. http://starship.python.net/~gherman/publications/tut-de/ Kind regards, Alexander ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org

Re: [Python-Dev] Fwd: Translating docs

2006-02-26 Thread martin
Zitat von Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Martin: There aren't any German docs, are there? I started translating the doc strings once, but never got to complete it. I still believe that the doc string translation is the only approach that could work in a reasonable way - you would have to use

Re: [Python-Dev] Using and binding relative names (was Re: PEP for Better Control of Nested Lexical Scopes)

2006-02-26 Thread Massimiliano Leoni
Why would you change the Python scoping rules, instead of using the function attributes, available from release 2.1 (PEP 232) ? For example, you may write: def incgen(start, inc): def incrementer(): incrementer.a += incrementer.b return incrementer.a incrementer.a = start - inc

Re: [Python-Dev] Using and binding relative names (was Re: PEP for Better Control of Nested Lexical Scopes)

2006-02-26 Thread Almann T. Goo
On 2/26/06, Steven Bethard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Then do you also dislike the original proposal: that only a single dot be allowed, and that the '.' would mean this name, but in the nearest outer scope that defines it? Then: def incrementer_getter(val): def incrementer():