Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Walter Dörwald wrote:
I have a small patch http://bugs.python.org/1506645 that adds
resizeterm() and resize_term() to the curses module. Can this still go
in for beta1? I'm not sure, if it needs some additional configure magic.
It can go into beta1 until the beta1
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
The optimisation of the if-elif case would then simply be to say that the
compiler can recognise if-elif chains like the one above where the RHS
of the comparisons are all hashable literals and collapse them to switch
statements.
Right (constants are usually
Greg Ewing wrote:
M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
My personal favorite is making the compiler
smarter to detect the mentioned if-elif-else scheme
and generate code which uses a lookup table for
implementing fast branching.
But then the values need to be actual compile-time
constants, precluding
But only if it makes sense. I still think there are some
severe conceptual difficulties with 0D arrays. One is
the question of how many items it contains. With 1 or
more dimensions, you can talk about its size along any
chosen dimension. But with 0 dimensions there's no size
to measure.
Georg Brandl wrote:
In string_replace, there is
if (PyString_Check(from)) {
/* Can this be made a '!check' after the Unicode check? */
}
#ifdef Py_USING_UNICODE
if (PyUnicode_Check(from))
return PyUnicode_Replace((PyObject *)self,
M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
Since replace() only works on string objects, it appears
as if a temporary string object would have to be created.
However, this would involve an unnecessary allocation
and copy process... it appears as if the refactoring
during the NFS sprint left out that case.
what's
Greetings!
Although python has
had full unicode support for filenames for a long time on selected platforms
(e.g. Windows), there is one glaring deficiency: It cannot import from
paths containing unicode. I´ve tried creating folders with chinese
characters and adding them to path, to no
Hello,
It seems to me that people don't object to my proposal, but don't find
it useful to them either.
The question is, what to do next. I guess one possibility is to raise
this discussion again in a few months, when people will be less
occupied with 2.5 beta. This is ok, although I would
Kristján V. Jónsson wrote:
A cursory glance at import.c shows that the import mechanism is fairly
complicated, and riddled with char *path thingies, and manual string
arithmetic. Do you have any suggestions on a clean way to unicodify the
import mechanism?
Can you install a PEP 302 path
At 01:29 AM 6/17/2006 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Kristján V. Jónsson wrote:
A cursory glance at import.c shows that the import mechanism is fairly
complicated, and riddled with char *path thingies, and manual string
arithmetic. Do you have any suggestions on a clean way to unicodify the
Noam Raphael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2006/6/16, Gareth McCaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
None of the above is intended to constitute argument for
or against Noam's proposed change to Python. Python isn't
primarily a language for mathematicians, and so much the
better for Python.
Thanks
On Jun 16, 2006, at 9:02 AM, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
At 01:29 AM 6/17/2006 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Kristján V. Jónsson wrote:
A cursory glance at import.c shows that the import mechanism is
fairly
complicated, and riddled with char *path thingies, and manual
string
arithmetic. Do
A colleague recently posted this message:
I'm trying to build a Python extension, and Python 2.4 insists on the MS
Visual C++ compiler version 7.1, which is included with the MS VC++ 2003
toolkit. This toolkit is no longer available for download from
Microsoft (superseded by the 2005
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006, Martin Blais wrote:
Hi all. Now let's see if I remember something about my module...
In the subprocess module, by default the files handles in the child
are inherited from the parent. To ignore a child's output, I can use
the stdout or stderr options to send the output
There is a related bit of functionality for subprocess that would allow
for asynchronous handling of IO to/from the called subprocess. It has
been implemented as a recipe [1], but requires the use of additional
pywin32 functionality on Windows. As was the case for the original
subprocess
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
Since replace() only works on string objects, it appears
as if a temporary string object would have to be created.
However, this would involve an unnecessary allocation
and copy process... it appears as if the refactoring
during the NFS sprint left
For folks contemplating what opcodes might need to be added to implement a
switch statement, it turns out that there is a clever way (i.e. a
filthy hack) to implement computed jumps in Python bytecode, using
WHY_CONTINUE and END_FINALLY.
I discovered this rather by accident, while working on
I would like to share a couple of observations that I made as I
studied the latest setobject implementation.
1. Is there a reason not to have PySet_CheckExact, given that
PyFrozenSet_CheckExact exists? Similarly, why PyAnySet_Check, but no
PySet_Check or PyFrozenSet_Check?
2. Type of
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
Actually, you would want to put it in sys.path_hooks, and then instances
would be placed in path_importer_cache automatically. If you are adding
it to the path_hooks after the fact, you should simply clear the
path_importer_cache. Simply poking stuff into the
Bob Ippolito wrote:
There's a similar issue in that if sys.prefix contains a colon, Python
is also busted:
http://python.org/sf/1507224
Of course, that's not a Windows issue, but it is everywhere else. The
offending code in that case is Modules/getpath.c,
Since it has to do with the
On 6/16/06, M.-A. Lemburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
what's the beta 1 status ? fixing this should be trivial, but I don't have
any
cycles to spare today.
Good question. PEP 356 says beta 1 was planned two days
ago...
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0356/
Bill Janssen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to build a Python extension, and Python 2.4 insists on
the MS
Visual C++ compiler version 7.1, which is included with the MS VC++
2003
toolkit. This toolkit is no longer available for download from
Microsoft (superseded by the 2005 version),
22 matches
Mail list logo
