Andrew Bennetts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 03:38:04PM -0300, Johan Dahlin wrote:
In an effort to reduce the memory usage used by GTK+ applications
written in python I've recently added a feature that allows attributes
to be lazy loaded in a module namespace. The gtk
Yingbo Qiu wrote:
Will anyone have interest in the patch?
This patch comes to late for Python 2.5. It might be considered for 2.6,
if anybody has time to review it.
Regards,
Martin
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
On Friday 14 July 2006 22:45, Jeremy Hylton wrote:
Maybe the basic question is right, but the emphasis needs to be
changed. If we had a rule that said the final release was 90 days
after the last submission that wasn't to fix a regression, we'd ask
Is this feature important enough to warrant
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 11:52:48PM -0700, Josiah Carlson wrote:
Andrew Bennetts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Have you seen the demandload hack that Mercurial uses? You can find it
here:
http://selenic.com/repo/hg?f=cb4715847a81;file=mercurial/demandload.py
You can see an
Guido van Rossum wrote:
You must be misunderstanding.
I don't think so. You appeared to say that the language changes too much
because
everyone wants different changes - that accumulate. I suggested a mechanism
allowing people to see only the changes they want - or none at all - might be
Barry Warsaw wrote:
Just as 2.5b2 was being release, I updated SF patch #1520294:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?
func=detailaid=1520294group_id=5470atid=305470
This fixes the pydoc, inspect, and types modules for built-in types
like getset and member descriptors. I'm not sure
Andrew Bennetts wrote:
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 03:38:04PM -0300, Johan Dahlin wrote:
In an effort to reduce the memory usage used by GTK+ applications
written in python I've recently added a feature that allows attributes
to be lazy loaded in a module namespace. The gtk python module
Anthony Baxter wrote:
On Friday 14 July 2006 22:45, Jeremy Hylton wrote:
Maybe the basic question is right, but the emphasis needs to be
changed. If we had a rule that said the final release was 90 days
after the last submission that wasn't to fix a regression, we'd ask
Is this feature
James Y Knight wrote:
On Jul 15, 2006, at 2:38 PM, Johan Dahlin wrote:
What I want to ask, is it possible to have a sanctioned way to implement
a dynamic module/namespace in python?
For instance, it could be implemented to allow you to replace the
__dict__ attribute in a module with a user
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
Just as a point of reference, the Importing package does something very
similar, to support weak and lazy imports:
http://cheeseshop.python.org/pypi/Importing
Interesting, I was not aware of that, thanks for the pointer.
Another reason for including this feature in the
On Monday 17 July 2006 20:27, Andrew MacIntyre wrote:
On the face of it, it seems to me that branching a new major
release at the 1st beta would be one way of managing this. The
trunk is not frozen for an extended period, and any features and
bug fixes could probably be backported from the
On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 10:29:22 -0300, Johan Dahlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I consider __getattribute__ a hack, being able to override __dict__ is less
hackish, IMHO.
Why do you feel one is more hackish than the other? In my experience the
opposite is true: certain C APIs expect __dict__ to be a
Boris Borcic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guido van Rossum wrote:
You must be misunderstanding.
I don't think so. You appeared to say that the language changes too much
because
everyone wants different changes - that accumulate. I suggested a mechanism
allowing people to see only the
On 7/16/06, Greg Ewing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For about the third time in my life, I thought I might
have found a use for cooperative super calls, but I've
run into another problem with the concept.
Consider:
class A(object):
def m(self):
print A.m
class B(object):
def
Hi Jeroen,
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 02:02:22PM +0200, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
He doesn't specifically need the builtin types to be extendable. It's
just nice to be able to define a single class in multiple modules.
There are various simple ways to do this; the one I'm using from
Hi Bob,
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 12:58:08AM -0700, Bob Ippolito wrote:
@main
def whatever():
...
It would probably need to be called something else, because main is
often the name of the main function...
Ah, but there is theoretically no name clash here :-)
@main
On Jul 17, 2006, at 11:25 AM, Armin Rigo wrote:
Hi Bob,
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 12:58:08AM -0700, Bob Ippolito wrote:
@main
def whatever():
...
It would probably need to be called something else, because main is
often the name of the main function...
Ah, but there is theoretically
Hi,
This is reported on sourceforge:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1524081group_id=5470atid=105470
I am willing to try and patch the problem, but I'd like to discuss my ideas
first.
The basic problem is that, in some locale, INFO.lower() != info. So,
initializing a
Josiah Carlson wrote:
Boris Borcic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guido van Rossum wrote:
You must be misunderstanding.
I don't think so. You appeared to say that the language changes too much
because
everyone wants different changes - that accumulate. I suggested a mechanism
allowing people
Boris Borcic wrote:
Boris Borcic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip..]
I am just saying :
(1) be aware that reversible source to source transforms means that
language
differences can *EFFECTIVELY* be made invisible - turned to purely private
choices (in the sense of because there
Boris Borcic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Josiah Carlson wrote:
Invariably user X and Y would have different sets of changes that they
want to use. Presumably, if the features were nontrivial, then they
would no longer be able to exchange code because it would have been
directed at a
I'm still plugging away on IronPython's cPickle, and I've stumbled
across another ambiguity in the pickle docs. From
http://docs.python.org/lib/node69.html:
If a string is returned, it names a global variable whose contents are
pickled as normal. The string returned by __reduce__ should be the
Hi my name is Matt Westerburg, I am a student and have only recently gotten into Python. But have fallen in love with the language thus far. Fantastic language and thank you very much for making it what it is today. I am looking into getting into working on Python. Still need sometime working with
On 7/17/06, matt westerburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi my name is Matt Westerburg, I am a student and have only recently gotten into Python. But have fallen in love with the language thus far. Fantastic language and thank you very much for making it what it is today. I am looking into getting
Bruce Christensen wrote:
Is something like the following close?
Close, yes.
if type(result) == tuple:
... (do appropriate things here)
elif isinstance(result, basestring):
name = result
module = unknown module
try:
module =
matt westerburg wrote:
Hi my name is Matt Westerburg, I am a student and have only recently
gotten into Python. But have fallen in love with the language thus
far. Fantastic language and thank you very much for making it what it
is today. I am looking into getting into working on Python.
26 matches
Mail list logo
