Which is correct?
$ egrep '(False|True)' Doc/lib/*.tex | grep -c \\constant{
74
$ egrep '(False|True)' Doc/lib/*.tex | grep -c \\code{
204
$ egrep 'None' Doc/lib/*.tex | grep -c \\code{
512
$ egrep 'None' Doc/lib/*.tex | grep -c \\constant{
83
n
___
On 08/05/2007 19.37, Neal Norwitz wrote:
Part of the problem might be that we are using an old version of svn
(1.1) AFAIK. IIRC these operations were sped up in later versions.
Yes they were. If that's the case, then probably the server should be updated.
--
Giovanni Bajo
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Just curious why 2to3 would not replace range() with list(range())?
|
| In most usages of range(), using the 3.0 range() will work just as
| well, and be more efficient.
If so, which it would seem from range2x
* James Y Knight [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-08 11:18:44]:
On May 8, 2007, at 8:49 AM, Armin Rigo wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 09:14:02AM +1000, Anthony Baxter wrote:
I'd like to suggest that we remove all (or nearly all) uses of
xrange from the stdlib. A quick scan shows that most of the
