Terry Reedy schrieb:
> "Georg Brandl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> | Terry Reedy schrieb:
> | > How about asking a Python specific question, with answered filled in
> rather
> | > that multiple choice selected: I would be willing to make up a bunch.
>
> And I
Terry Reedy wrote:
> My underlying point: seeing porno spam on the practice site gave me a bad
> itch both because I detest spammers in general and because I would not want
> visitors turned off to Python by something that is completely out of place
> and potentially offensive to some. So I am
""Martin v. Löwis"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|> If we anticipate users rather than programmers to register (as if so, it
| > would be nice to collect that info to formulate sensible responses),
then
| > questions like
| > The orb that shines in the sky during t
"Georg Brandl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Terry Reedy schrieb:
| > How about asking a Python specific question, with answered filled in
rather
| > that multiple choice selected: I would be willing to make up a bunch.
And I would spend longer than a couple of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >> The orb that shines in the sky during the day.
>
> Martin> This question I could not answer, because I don't know what an
> Martin> orb is (it's not an object request broker, right?)
>
> Martin> Is the answer "sun"?
>
> It is indeed.
On 5/15/07, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm looking at Python/marshal.c and there are a lot of places that
> > don't support sequences that are larger than would fit into size(int).
> > I looked for marshal referenced in the PEP and didn't find anything.
> > Was this an oversig
On 15-May-07, at 12:32 AM, Georg Brandl wrote:
>
> There are two problems with this:
> * The set of questions is limited, and bots can be programmed to
> know them all.
Sure, but if someone is customizing their bot to python's issue
tracker, in all likelyhood they would have to be dealt with
>> The orb that shines in the sky during the day.
Martin> This question I could not answer, because I don't know what an
Martin> orb is (it's not an object request broker, right?)
Martin> Is the answer "sun"?
It is indeed. I would use "star" instead of "orb". It might be
On 5/15/07, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm looking at Python/marshal.c and there are a lot of places that
> > don't support sequences that are larger than would fit into size(int).
> > I looked for marshal referenced in the PEP and didn't find anything.
> > Was this an oversig
Ah, forgot to mention that a browsable version of the
branch is at
http://svn.python.org/view/python/branches/ssize_t/?rev=42382
Unfortunately, you cannot check out that URL. OTOH,
you can checkout "peg revisions" (I have no clue what a
peg is)
http://svn.python.org/projects/python/branches/[EMA
> If we anticipate users rather than programmers to register (as if so, it
> would be nice to collect that info to formulate sensible responses), then
> questions like
> The orb that shines in the sky during the day.
This question I could not answer, because I don't know what an orb is
(it'
> I'm looking at Python/marshal.c and there are a lot of places that
> don't support sequences that are larger than would fit into size(int).
> I looked for marshal referenced in the PEP and didn't find anything.
> Was this an oversight or intentional?
These changes were only made after merging th
Martin,
I'm looking at Python/marshal.c and there are a lot of places that
don't support sequences that are larger than would fit into size(int).
I looked for marshal referenced in the PEP and didn't find anything.
Was this an oversight or intentional?
To give you some examples of what I mean fr
On Tue, 15 May 2007 09:26:55 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Christian> I tried to use gdbinit today and found that the "fragile"
>Christian> pystacks macro didn't work anymore. I don't know gdb very
>Christian> well, but this turned out to work a bit more reliably:
>
>...
>
>Thank
Christian> I tried to use gdbinit today and found that the "fragile"
Christian> pystacks macro didn't work anymore. I don't know gdb very
Christian> well, but this turned out to work a bit more reliably:
...
Thanks. I'll give it a try and check it in if it checks out.
Skip
_
Hi,
I tried to use gdbinit today and found that the "fragile" pystacks macro didn't
work anymore. I don't know gdb very well, but this turned out to work a bit more
reliably:
# print the entire Python call stack
define pystack
set $last=0
while $sp != $last
if $pc > PyEval_EvalFra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On May 15, 2007, at 12:55 AM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> I don't think I can be more plain than that: yes, I do not take
> security
> seriously enough to release security fixes for old Python versions
> more
> than once a year. As a user, it's easy
>> On Mon, May 14, 2007, "Martin v. L?wis" wrote:
>>> Skip(?):
In the meantime (thinking out loud here), would it be possible to
keep search engines from seeing a submission or an edit until a
trusted person has had a chance to approve it?
>>> It would be pos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On May 14, 2007, at 7:19 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>> Still, I'm in agreement with you that the repository holds the
>> security
>> patches and that the tarballs are a convenience. They are an
>> important
>> convenience though, so I would say t
Aaron Brady wrote:
> It might be useful in cases where you want the calling signature to look
> alike for a group of dispatched functions and the added overhead the
> decorator adds isn't a problem. But you probably wouldn't want that
> overhead all the time, so having it as an optional decorator
> -Original Message-
> From: Steven Bethard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 1:54 AM
>
> On 5/15/07, Aaron Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You might be able to get away without a PEP, but you'll definitely
> need to post an implementation patch to the bug trac
Terry Reedy schrieb:
> "Andrew McNamara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> | I'm reluctant to mention the name of one particular tool I'm aware
> | of, but as well as the above, it also has OCR to defeat CAPTCHA, and
>
> How about asking a Python specific question, w
22 matches
Mail list logo
