On 12 Nov 2007, 03:24:34, Jan Claeys wrote:
Op zondag 11-11-2007 om 17:19 uur [tijdzone -0800], schreef Brett
Cannon:
On Nov 11, 2007 4:00 PM, Graham Horler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been developing in Python since 1.5, and now have to support 2.1
as a minimum version. I do like
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
I don't know. Is an XML document ill-formed if it doesn't contain an
XML declaration, is not in UTF-8 or UTF-8, but there's external
encoding info?
If there is external encoding info, matching the actual encoding,
it would be well-formed. Of course, preserving that
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
In case it isn't clear - this is exactly my view also.
But is there an API to do it? As MAL points out that API would have
to return not an encoding, but a pair of an encoding and the rewound
stream.
The API wouldn't operate on streams. Instead, you pass a
On 2007-11-11 23:22, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
First, XML-RPC is not the only mechanism using XML over a network
connection. Second, you don't want to do this if you're dealing
with several 100 MB of data just because you want to figure
out the encoding.
That's my original claim/question: what
On Nov 12, 2007, at 8:16 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
We have a -1 from Martin and a +1 from Walter, Guido and myself.
Pretty clear vote if you ask me. I'd say we end the discussion here
and move on.
If we're counting, you've got a -1 on the codec from me as well.
Martin's right: there's no
Fred Drake wrote:
On Nov 12, 2007, at 8:16 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
We have a -1 from Martin and a +1 from Walter, Guido and myself.
Pretty clear vote if you ask me. I'd say we end the discussion here
and move on.
If we're counting, you've got a -1 on the codec from me as well.
On Nov 12, 2007, at 8:56 AM, Walter Dörwald wrote:
It isn't embedded. codecs.detect_xml_encoding() is callable without
any problems (though not documented).
Not documented means not available, I think.
Who would use such a function for what?
Being able to detect the encoding can be useful
Simply, it's sometimes desired to know the encoding for purposes that
don't require immediate decoding. A function would be quite handy
in these cases.
In os.path? os.path.encoding(location)?
Bill
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
On Nov 12, 2007, at 10:54 AM, Bill Janssen wrote:
In os.path? os.path.encoding(location)?
I wasn't thinking it would be that general; determining the encoding
for an arbitrary text file is a larger problem than it is for an XML
file.
An implementation based strictly on the rules from the
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (11/05/07 - 11/12/07)
Tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue
number. Do NOT respond to this message.
1321 open (+17) / 11592 closed (+21) / 12913 total (+38)
Open issues with patches: 418
Average
On Nov 12, 2007 12:50 AM, Graham Horler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12 Nov 2007, 03:24:34, Jan Claeys wrote:
Op zondag 11-11-2007 om 17:19 uur [tijdzone -0800], schreef Brett
Cannon:
On Nov 11, 2007 4:00 PM, Graham Horler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been developing in Python
On Nov 12, 2007 12:50 AM, Graham Horler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12 Nov 2007, 03:24:34, Jan Claeys wrote:
Op zondag 11-11-2007 om 17:19 uur [tijdzone -0800], schreef Brett
Cannon:
On Nov 11, 2007 4:00 PM, Graham Horler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been developing in Python
Collin Winter wrote:
On Nov 12, 2007 12:50 AM, Graham Horler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12 Nov 2007, 03:24:34, Jan Claeys wrote:
Op zondag 11-11-2007 om 17:19 uur [tijdzone -0800], schreef Brett
Cannon:
On Nov 11, 2007 4:00 PM, Graham Horler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been developing
On Nov 11, 2007 7:24 PM, Jan Claeys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Graham wants to convert his code such that it works on both Python 2.x
(probably even early versions of it?) Python 3.x. Not 2 instances of
code, but one source that works on both 2.x and 3.x...
The transition strategy for 3.0
Please indulge this off-topic post. I know there are a lot of Python
developers here whose mother tongue is not English; would those folks
mind participating in the experiment below?
--Guido
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jose Oriol Lopez Berengueres [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Nov
On Nov 12, 2007, at 8:16 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
We have a -1 from Martin and a +1 from Walter, Guido and myself.
Pretty clear vote if you ask me. I'd say we end the discussion here
and move on.
If we're counting, you've got a -1 on the codec from me as well.
Martin's right: there's no
16 matches
Mail list logo
