* This didn't show up when I sent it the other day, so I'm resending it.
Facundo Batista wrote:
2007/12/10, Ron Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This is from the search page of the tracker.
select name=resolution id=resolution
option value=don't care/option
option value=
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (12/07/07 - 12/14/07)
Tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue
number. Do NOT respond to this message.
1355 open (+41) / 11756 closed (+19) / 13111 total (+60)
Open issues with patches: 423
Average
On Dec 14, 2007 9:38 AM, Isaac Morland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we successfully resolved this. Adam Olsen will produce a patch
that allows one to specify a single file descriptor to which a zero
byte will be written by the C-level signal handler. Twisted and PyGTK
I'm surprised
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Guido van Rossum wrote:
I think we successfully resolved this. Adam Olsen will produce a patch
that allows one to specify a single file descriptor to which a zero
byte will be written by the C-level signal handler. Twisted and PyGTK
I'm surprised that the byte is zero,
Should these two issues be consolidated? It looks as if they are attacking
the same problem.
Thoughts?
Joseph Armbruster
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
Python-related projects: join the PyCon Development Sprints!
The development sprints are a key part of PyCon, a chance for the
contributors to open-source projects to get together face-to-face for
up to four days of intensive learning and development. Newbies sit at
the same table as the gurus,
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05:20 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The best solution I can think of is to add a new API that takes a
signal and a file descriptor and registers a C-level handler for that
signal which writes a byte to the file descriptor. You can then create
a
On Dec 14, 2007 2:12 PM, Aahz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05:20 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The best solution I can think of is to add a new API that takes a
signal and a file descriptor and registers a C-level handler for that
signal which
[private]
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Dec 14, 2007 2:12 PM, Aahz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05:20 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The best solution I can think of is to add a new API that takes a
signal and a file descriptor
