Terry Reedy wrote:
If the testdir disallows the search indexer, then there should be no need
to disable Windows Search Service. If privatizing the dir kept other
programs out, then likewise.
| Or were you suggesting that there is some programmatic way for the
| test suite to create
Trent Nelson wrote:
1. For a given python[_d].exe, always use the same test directory,
but hash it against the entire python process path such that it's
unique only for a given python instance.
This is to guard against several build runs in parallel, presumably?
2. Make sure every time a
I agree with Tim, you can jump through as many hoops as you want (setting
directories private, using %TEMP% exclusively, etc), but I doubt anything is
going to change the behaviour of things like virus scanners, for example.
Tim, let me know if you need help with anything, perhaps we could set
Hi all,
the news file for python 2.6 does not mention that you need to define
__hash__ in case you define __eq__ for a class.
This breaks some code (for me: mercurial and pyparsing).
Shouldn't this be documented somewhere (I also cannot find it in the
whatsnew file).
- Ralf
I don't like the part where the solution kills the Python process during
a rebuild. It's too surprising for the user.
Hmmm. When you say rebuild, I assume you mean the change I made to the
pythoncore project's pre-link step to call kill_python.exe, and not to the
post-build step of
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:49 PM, Neal Norwitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The release schedule for 2.6/3.0 is
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0361/
3.0 will have the feature, 2.6 may or may not.
There is an issue for this: http://bugs.python.org/issue2331
n
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 4:47
Hello Barry,
Great job with the releases!
Barry Warsaw wrote:
On behalf of the Python development team and the Python community, I'm
happy to announce the second alpha release of Python 2.6, and the
fourth alpha release of Python 3.0. [...]
In case you don't know already, the website is
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 4:38 PM, Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 2:46 AM, Ralf Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the news file for python 2.6 does not mention that you need to define
__hash__ in case you define __eq__ for a class.
This breaks some code (for
Understood. Neither do I. :-) But maybe you could get the authors of
that code into this discussion?
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 7:53 AM, Ralf Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 4:38 PM, Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 2:46 AM, Ralf
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What specific code breaks? Maybe we need to turn this into a warning
in order to be more backwards compatible?
I looked at Mercurial.
It doesn't use __hash__ at all. It uses __eq__ in two files, three total uses:
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (03/28/08 - 04/04/08)
Tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue
number. Do NOT respond to this message.
1799 open (+34) / 12577 closed (+13) / 14376 total (+47)
Open issues with patches: 536
Average
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 8:08 AM, Jason Orendorff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What specific code breaks? Maybe we need to turn this into a warning
in order to be more backwards compatible?
I looked at Mercurial.
It
On 04/04/2008, Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It doesn't use __hash__ at all. It uses __eq__ in two files, three total
uses:
http://hg.intevation.org/mercurial/crew/file/6c4e12682fb9/mercurial/commands.py
Paul Moore wrote:
That looks like it. I'll work up a patch and submit it to the
Mercurial developers.
I've already got one going.
Cheers,
Dirkjan
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
I can offer an OS X x86 machine to run a buildbot on. This is a physical
machine,
running OS X 10.5 Leopard.
Thomas
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
Tim Golden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Terry Reedy wrote:
| I suspect, but do not know, that the dialog box effects changes through
| user-programmable interfaces. So while I would start with manual
changes
| to see if that solves the problem, I presume there
What do others that do Windows development think? I don't have a
problem changing the build behaviour if the approach I've taken is
generally disliked.
I think kill_python should only ever be invoked in the build slaves;
it should *not* be part of the regular build. If developers find they
Gerhard Häring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| In case you don't know already, the website is not fully updated, yet:
|
| http://www.python.org/download/releases/2.6/
|
| Top of the page says 2.6a1 instead of 2.6a2.
|
| This file is apparently not yet updated for
Ok, I'll change the approach this weekend.
Trent.
From: Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 April 2008 19:57
To: Trent Nelson
Cc: Christian Heimes; python-dev@python.org
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] r62129 - in python/trunk: PCbuild/debug.vsprops
Error 404: File not found
That has a simple explanation: the file is not there because it just
doesn't exist yet, which in turn is because I have problems creating
it (which is in turn due to switching to Visual Studio 2008).
Regards,
Martin
___
Interesting results! I committed the patch to test_socket.py in r62152. I was
expecting all other platforms except for Windows to behave consistently (i.e.
pass). That is, given the following:
import socket
host = '127.0.0.1'
sock = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 25, 2008, at 2:05 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did I misread the directions or do I really need the --create-prefix
arg?
Barry You do, the first time you push a user branch because
users/skip
Barry doesn't exist yet. It's
On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 13:24:49 -0700, Trent Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting results! I committed the patch to test_socket.py in r62152. I
was expecting all other platforms except for Windows to behave consistently
(i.e. pass). That is, given the following:
import socket
Did anyone else notice that the dates are incorrect in the news items
on the front page? As an example:
Published: Mon, 4 Apr 2008
which should be
Published: Fri, 4 Apr 2008
I'll poke around and see if I can figure it out.
Cheers //M
___
2008/4/4, Martin Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Did anyone else notice that the dates are incorrect in the news items
on the front page? As an example:
Published: Mon, 4 Apr 2008
which should be
Published: Fri, 4 Apr 2008
I'll poke around and see if I can figure it out.
There is a file
On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 07:38:04 -0700, Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 2:46 AM, Ralf Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the news file for python 2.6 does not mention that you need to define
__hash__ in case you define __eq__ for a class.
This breaks some code (for me:
On Apr 4, 2008, at 6:37 PM, Guilherme Polo wrote:
2008/4/4, Martin Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Did anyone else notice that the dates are incorrect in the news items
on the front page? As an example:
Published: Mon, 4 Apr 2008
which should be
Published: Fri, 4 Apr 2008
I'll poke around and
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Thomas Heller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can offer an OS X x86 machine to run a buildbot on. This is a physical
machine,
running OS X 10.5 Leopard.
Thanks Thomas!
Martin and I will coordinate with you off-list.
n
28 matches
Mail list logo
