Martin v. Löwis schrieb:
I'd like to propose we delete Lib/Distutils/command/wininst-9.0.exe, and
enable the building of that project by default in the standard build process
(and I'll setup the x64 build of the executable similarly).
There are two issues here:
a) how does the binary get
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Trent Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nod, if SO_EXCLUSIVEADDRUSE is used instead in the code I posted, Windows
raises EADDRINUSE on the second bind(). I don't have access to any Linux
boxes at the moment, so I can't test what sort of error is raised with
Rahul Garg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Note this message has been posted to numpy-discussion and python-dev.
| Sorry for the multiple posting but I thought both python devs and
| numpy users will be interested. If you believe your list should not
| receive this
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note the rm: conftest.dSYM: is a directory. This occurred a few
times during the configure process. Didn't cause it to conk out, but
is annoying.
Brett I am assuming this is on your OS X machine, Skip?
Yes, sorry. I forgot to mention that.
Without an implementation and supporting profile data nobody is going
to believe that you can do name lookup faster than with the built-in
dict type in CPython. Note that names seen by the parser are already
interned, so most of what you seem to be proposing is already
implemented...
On Wed, Mar
I am interested in understanding the python source code. Can someone direct
me to resources (documentation,book,archive of mailling lists,etc) that will
assist me ?
Thank you,
Avi
--
Avi Kohn
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
(Though as the saying goes, little duplication is normal (and perhaps
wanted) for open source software.)
Sorry! I meant a little, completely reversing the meaning of my sentence.
Dag Sverre
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
What is Spyke?
In many performance critical projects, it is often necessary to
rewrite parts of the application in C. However writing C wrappers can
be time consuming. Spyke offers an alternative approach. You add
annotations to your Python code as strings. These strings are
discarded by
[snip]
c) Strings as type declarations : Do you think I should use decorators
instead at least for function type declarations?
You might be interested in 3.0's (and maybe 2.6's) function annotations. See
PEP 3107.
thanks for patiently reading this,
comments and inquiries sought.
rahul
Hi,
I use Python in my CS1 and CS2 curriculum and I have a question.
As I've been using the Python 3.0 alphas one of the things that I am
bothered by is that I cannot see the sequence produced by range
without introducing students to the list() function.
I typically introduce range on day 1
I'd object to it returning something that resembles a list too
closely, but I could live with str(range(3)) return 0, 1, 2. We
should probably have a cutoff so that if there are more than 6 values
it'll show the first 3 values, then dots, then the last 2 values. (The
cutoff would be computed so
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 11:58 PM, Avi Kohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am interested in understanding the python source code. Can someone
direct me to resources (documentation,book,archive of mailling lists,etc)
that will assist me ?
What part(s) do you want to learn about? The CPython
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Jeffrey Yasskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 2:15 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 02:21 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OTOH, I'd rather there be OOWTDI so whatever the consensus is is fine
with me.
This strikes me as a
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 7:37 PM, Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Jeffrey Yasskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 2:15 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 02:21 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OTOH, I'd rather there be OOWTDI
14 matches
Mail list logo
