On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 05:16:38PM -0400, Jesse Noller wrote:
Where would that chapter end up (source-wise) I think a few of us
might have additional things to add ;)
This would be Doc/library/ipc.rst. The chapter is 'Interprocess
Communication and Networking'.
Is anyone else finding it
+1 on a C API for enabling and disabling GC.
I have several instances where I create a large number of objects non-cyclic
objects where I see huge GC overhead (30+ seconds with gc enabled, 0.15
seconds when disabled).
+1000 to fixing the garbage collector to be smart enough to self-regulate
Hi,
Kevin Jacobs jacobs at bioinformed.com bioinformed at gmail.com writes:
+1 on a C API for enabling and disabling GC. I have several instances where
I create a large number of objects non-cyclic objects where I see huge GC
overhead (30+ seconds with gc enabled, 0.15 seconds when
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Antoine Pitrou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Kevin Jacobs jacobs at bioinformed.com bioinformed at gmail.com
writes:
+1 on a C API for enabling and disabling GC. I have several instances
where
I create a large number of objects non-cyclic objects where I see
2008/6/20 Kevin Jacobs [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Antoine Pitrou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Kevin Jacobs jacobs at bioinformed.com bioinformed at gmail.com
writes:
+1 on a C API for enabling and disabling GC. I have several instances
where
I
Is anyone else finding it increasingly odd that subprocess, signal,
socket/ssl, and syncore are in the same chapter? I'm tempted to move
socket, ssl, asyncore+asynchat into a 'networking' chapter, and then
also move SocketServer from the 'Internet Protocols' chapter into this
new chapter.
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (06/13/08 - 06/20/08)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue
number. Do NOT respond to this message.
1917 open (+28) / 13057 closed (+19) / 14974 total (+47)
Open issues with patches: 581
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/6/20 Kevin Jacobs [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Antoine Pitrou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Kevin Jacobs jacobs at bioinformed.com bioinformed at gmail.com
writes:
+1
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 08:55:13AM -0700, Bill Janssen wrote:
Is anyone else finding it increasingly odd that subprocess, signal,
socket/ssl, and syncore are in the same chapter? I'm tempted to move
socket, ssl, asyncore+asynchat into a 'networking' chapter, and then
also move
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 08:55:13AM -0700, Bill Janssen wrote:
Is anyone else finding it increasingly odd that subprocess, signal,
socket/ssl, and syncore are in the same chapter? I'm tempted to move
socket, ssl, asyncore+asynchat into a 'networking' chapter, and then
also move
I thought there was a discussion of this earlier, and the idea was to
leave the prior implementation, because that's how it's implemented in
3.0. bin() is a new feature in 2.6, so there's no particular need to
make it work like hex() and oct().
Recall that in 3.0, __bin__, __oct__, and
A.M. Kuchling wrote:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 08:55:13AM -0700, Bill Janssen wrote:
Is anyone else finding it increasingly odd that subprocess, signal,
socket/ssl, and syncore are in the same chapter? I'm tempted to move
socket, ssl, asyncore+asynchat into a 'networking' chapter, and then
also
On Jun 20, 2008, at 5:46 PM, Steve Holden wrote:
Perhaps we need a split between networking technologies and
network-based applications.
Perhaps that would help.
I certainly see HTTP as being on the same layer as SMTP and the like,
but application protocols that ride on top of HTTP are a
I can help. I don't have a patch against the trunk but my first
revisions of the patch
for annotations did handle things like tuple parameters which are
relevant to 2.6.
Ah yes, I forgot about nested parameters. I see that 53170 still has
nested parameters, but they were removed at some later
Le vendredi 20 juin 2008 à 17:44 +0200, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc a écrit :
In short: the gc is tuned for typical usage. If your usage of python
is specific,
use gc.set_threshold and increase its values.
It's fine for people in the know who take the time to test their code
using various gc
15 matches
Mail list logo