I just realized that I had not received any emails on python-checkins
about the buildbot failures I accidentally caused. And then I noticed
that I had not gotten any emails for py3k in a while. Did that get
switched off on purpose?
-Brett
___
Python-Dev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jan 17, 2009, at 8:03 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
Le Saturday 17 January 2009 04:45:28 Barry Warsaw, vous avez écrit :
The optparse one could easily be fixed for 2.6, if we agree it should
be fixed. This untested patch should do it I think:
Inde
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Jan 16, 2009, at 10:52 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>>> - -if type(args[0]) is types.StringType:
>>> +if type(args[0]) in types.StringTypes:
>>
>> It'd probably be bet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jan 17, 2009, at 2:25 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 12:25 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" > wrote:
Index: Lib/optparse.py
===
--- Lib/optparse.py(revision 68465)
+++
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jan 16, 2009, at 10:52 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Barry Warsaw
wrote:
The optparse one could easily be fixed for 2.6, if we agree it
should be
fixed. This untested patch should do it I think:
Index: Lib
this was found as part of the regression tests, compiling python under
wine under msys with mingw32. test_maxint64 failed. i tracked it
down to the assumption that a long will fit into 32-bits, which
obviously... it won't! the simplest case is to add a test for the
length of the data string bein
In article <655d2f11-818d-43e4-8234-1dd6c3b74...@qwest.net>,
Roger Vossler wrote:
> > Any idea when the Mac OSX disk image (.dmg file) for Python 3.x
> > will be available?
>
> Are we talking about days? weeks? Or, should I start learning how to
> build Python from
> source? Any info would b
> Are we talking about days? weeks? Or, should I start learning how to
> build Python from source? Any info would be appreciated.
The latter. Don't ever expect that others will help you. This is open
source; you have to help yourself.
Regards,
Martin
__
Hi,
Any idea when the Mac OSX disk image (.dmg file) for Python 3.x
will be available?
Are we talking about days? weeks? Or, should I start learning how to
build Python from
source? Any info would be appreciated.
Thanks, Roger.
___
Python-De
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton lkcl.net> writes:
> running under wine, ftell() has an off-by-one bug, where the file
> position accidentally doesn't include the fact that the CR of the CRLF
> has been skipped. but, now with the fgets() bug fixed, the regression
> tests pass, but there's still the o
folks, hi,
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16982 related to this:
from array import array
TESTFN = "testfile.txt"
def fail(x):
print x
testlines = [
"spam, spam and eggs\n",
"eggs, spam, ham and spam\n",
"saussages, spam, spam and eggs\n",
"spam, ham, spam and eggs\n"
In article <7043cb7c-18f4-4e16-ae0c-cda6ba311...@barrys-emacs.org>,
Barry Scott wrote:
> It seems that the packaging of Mac Python 2.6 is missing at least one
> file
> that is critical to the operation of bundlebuilder.py.
>
> I've logged the issue as http://bugs.python.org/issue4937.
I've n
> That seems a bit *too* strict to me, as long as the Unicode strings
> contain just ASCII. I'm fine with fixing both cases Barry mentioned,
> especially if it otherwise breaks "from __future__ import
> unicode_literals". I expect though that as one tries more things one
> will find more things bro
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 12:25 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>> Index: Lib/optparse.py
>> ===
>> --- Lib/optparse.py(revision 68465)
>> +++ Lib/optparse.py(working copy)
>> @@ -994,7 +994,7 @@
>> """add_option(Option)
>
> About 5 test fail in emulated environment due bugs in emulator.
oh - nearly forgot: several of the ctypes tests fail quite spectacularly :)
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscrib
hiya roumen, good to hear from you - i've been merging in the work
that you did, on mingw native-and-cross compiles. got a couple of
questions, will post them in the bugreport ok?
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Roumen Petrov
wrote:
> Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> [SNIP]
>>
>> i'm going
On 1/17/09, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Mark Dickinson gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> Benjamin wondered aloud about deprecating PyNumber_Long
>> in the issue 4910 discussion; I suggested deprecating
>> PyNumber_Int instead, but on reflection I think Benjamin's right:
>> it seems neater to keep the PyNumbe
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
[SNIP]
i'm going to _try_ to merge in #3871 but it's... the prospect of
sitting waiting for configure to take THREE hours to complete, due to
/bin/sh.exe instances taking TWO SECONDS _each_ to start up does not
really fill me with deep joy.
As from version 1.
Hi All,
May I ask for a vote how issue to be resolved.
The problem is command "... setup.py install ... --root=/$(DESTDIR)" if
DESTDIR is specified:
error: could not create '//...': No such host or network path
Currently issue http://bugs.python.org/issue2233 propose three solutions:
1) replace
It seems that the packaging of Mac Python 2.6 is missing at least one
file
that is critical to the operation of bundlebuilder.py.
I've logged the issue as http://bugs.python.org/issue4937.
Barry
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http
Le Saturday 17 January 2009 04:45:28 Barry Warsaw, vous avez écrit :
> The optparse one could easily be fixed for 2.6, if we agree it should
> be fixed. This untested patch should do it I think:
>
> Index: Lib/optparse.py
> ===
> ---
Mark Dickinson gmail.com> writes:
>
> Benjamin wondered aloud about deprecating PyNumber_Long
> in the issue 4910 discussion; I suggested deprecating
> PyNumber_Int instead, but on reflection I think Benjamin's right:
> it seems neater to keep the PyNumber_Int <-> int() <-> nb_int
> naming conne
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 10:42 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> Assuming we have been moving the C API usage to PyInt and not PyLong,
> then yes it makes sense.
Hmm. I don't think there's been any such move. Maybe there
should be.
Benjamin wondered aloud about deprecating PyNumber_Long
in the issue 49
> Index: Lib/optparse.py
> ===
> --- Lib/optparse.py(revision 68465)
> +++ Lib/optparse.py(working copy)
> @@ -994,7 +994,7 @@
> """add_option(Option)
> add_option(opt_str, ..., kwarg=val, ...)
> "
24 matches
Mail list logo
