Martin v. Löwis martin at v.loewis.de writes:
It's not really reproducible. I think it sometimes happens when I
restart the master; sometimes, some clients fail to reconnect
(properly).
Another common problem is that some buildbot fails in the middle of the test
suite, with the following
Right, how do developers benefit from a buildbot?
From my experience (five large buildbots with many developers plus two
with only a couple of developers), a buildbot does little good unless
the tests are reliable and not too noisy. Reliable is best achieved
by having tests be deterministic and
Chris Bergstresser schrieb:
I like the proposed set.get() method, personally. list.get(index)
gets the item at that index, dict.get(key) gets the item associated
with that key, set.get() gets an item, but doesn't place any
guarantees on which item is returned.
Sorry to nitpick, but there
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Georg Brandl g.bra...@gmx.net wrote:
Sorry to nitpick, but there is no list.get().
No? How ... odd. I guess it wouldn't have come up, but I was sure
there was a .get method which took an optional default parameter if
the index didn't exist, mirroring the
Chris Bergstresser schrieb:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Georg Brandl g.bra...@gmx.net wrote:
Sorry to nitpick, but there is no list.get().
No? How ... odd. I guess it wouldn't have come up, but I was sure
there was a .get method which took an optional default parameter if
the
[Chris Bergstresser]
Still, I think my
point stands--it's a clear extrapolation from the existing dict.get().
Not really. One looks-up a key and supplies a default value if not found.
The other, set.get(), doesn't have a key to lookup.
A dict.get() can be meaningfully used in a loop
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Chris Bergstresser ch...@subtlety.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Georg Brandl g.bra...@gmx.net wrote:
Sorry to nitpick, but there is no list.get().
No? How ... odd.
Odd indeed. My first reaction was: it is not needed because lists
support
Raymond Hettinger python at rcn.com writes:
[Chris Bergstresser]
Still, I think my
point stands--it's a clear extrapolation from the existing dict.get().
Not really. One looks-up a key and supplies a default value if not found.
The other, set.get(), doesn't have a key to lookup.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Raymond Hettinger python at rcn.com writes:
[Chris Bergstresser]
Still, I think my
point stands--it's a clear extrapolation from the existing dict.get().
Not really. One looks-up a key and supplies a default
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 02:20:04PM -0400, geremy condra wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Raymond Hettinger python at rcn.com writes:
set.getone() then ?
ugh- other spellings much preferred.
set[] ? (Just kidding, really.)
Oleg.
--
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
A dict.get() can be meaningfully used in a loop (because the key can vary).
A set.get() returns the same value over and over again (because there is
no key).
There are two ideas of set.get floating about:
1) get an arbitrary object
2) get the object in the set with
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Raymond Hettinger pyt...@rcn.com wrote:
[Chris Bergstresser]
Still, I think my
point stands--it's a clear extrapolation from the existing dict.get().
Not really. One looks-up a key and supplies a default value if not found.
The other, set.get(), doesn't
On Oct 27, 2009, at 2:50 PM, Terry Reedy wrote more and more and more
and more and more and more and more and more and more:
This topic needs its own flippin' newsgroup.
S
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Barry Warsaw wrote:
On behalf of the Python community, I'm happy to announce the
availability of Python 2.6.4. This is the latest production-ready
version in the Python 2.6 series.
We had a little trouble with the Python 2.6.3 release; a
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 3:06 PM, sstein...@gmail.com
sstein...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 27, 2009, at 2:50 PM, Terry Reedy wrote more and more and more and
more and more and more and more and more and more:
This topic needs its own flippin' newsgroup.
S
Don't like it? Mute the conversation
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
There are two ideas of set.get floating about:
1) get an arbitrary object
2) get the object in the set with the same 'value'(hash+eq) as an input arg
(the intern case). In this case, there is a 'key', even if it is somewhat
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
There are two ideas of set.get floating about:
1) get an arbitrary object
2) get the object in the set with the same 'value'(hash+eq) as an input arg
[geremy condra]
Was it ever decided whether this would fall under the moratorium?
Decided isn't the right word:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-October/093373.html
FWIW, I'm a strong -1 on both proposals.
Just add a short get_one() function and a get_equivalent() recipe
to
sstein...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 27, 2009, at 2:50 PM, Terry Reedy wrote more and more and more
and more and more and more and more and more and more:
Actually, I wrote 7 succinct lines that summarized and made a proposal.
In general, I snip when quoting and write concisely as possible.
On Oct 27, 2009, at 11:02 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
sstein...@gmail.com wrote:
This topic needs its own flippin' newsgroup.
You could have said just that, appropriate or not, without dumping
on anyone in particular.
I was not trying to dump on you in particular, I picked a random
message
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Raymond Hettinger pyt...@rcn.com wrote:
[geremy condra]
Was it ever decided whether this would fall under the moratorium?
Decided isn't the right word:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-October/093373.html
snip
I'm unclear- does that imply
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:20:03 + (UTC), Antoine Pitrou
solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
(*) Remember, however, that Tarek and work on Distribute, and also on
bringing pieces of setuptools/Distribute functionality into distutils.
But if that's the case then why not work on any third party tool..?
22 matches
Mail list logo
