Am 09.07.2010 00:01, schrieb Fred Drake:
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Alexander Belopolsky
alexander.belopol...@gmail.com wrote:
I am against mark-up in doc-strings, but this problem can be easily
solved by placing a magic character at __doc__[0] to indicate that the
rest is (mini)reST.
Am 09.07.2010 02:35, schrieb MRAB:
That's not what I'm asking. I'm asking what happens if you take an
existing Python installation's re module, move it aside, and drop
regex in its place as re.py.
Doing that and then running Python's own test suite as well as the
test suites of major
Hello there.
I´m in the process of upgrading code to use python 2.7 and the new Py_Buffer
objects. I have, however, come across an inconsistency in the documentation,
both in the pep and the python docs, with the actual implementation.
In addition to the different function signatures mentioned
Georg Brandl g.bra...@gmx.net writes:
Am 08.07.2010 17:44, schrieb Martin Geisler:
Steve Holden st...@holdenweb.com writes:
Martin Geisler wrote:
Stephen J. Turnbull step...@xemacs.org writes:
Just ask Martin, there are too many possibilities here to worry
about. If maybe we want it,
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 2:51 AM, Georg Brandl g.bra...@gmx.net wrote:
Yes, but[tm] it is not always easy to find the correct module to look for
__docformat__ when given an object.
True. That PEP was written before decorators were common, in
particular. That's changed the landscape in
In addition, the PyBufferProcs documentation has not bee updated to reflect the
new buffer interface.
From: python-dev-bounces+kristjan=ccpgames@python.org
[mailto:python-dev-bounces+kristjan=ccpgames@python.org] On Behalf Of
Kristján Valur Jónsson
Sent: 9. júlí 2010 08:39
To:
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Victor Stinner
victor.stin...@haypocalc.com wrote:
I created an svn branch because I think that it's easier to review short
commits than one unique huge patch. The branch also helps me to share the
branch between different computers, and allow other people to
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 08:38:53 +
Kristján Valur Jónsson krist...@ccpgames.com wrote:
In short, what the documentation fails to mention (and the pep) is whether
posessing a
locked Py_Buffer structure also constitutes holding a reference to the
exporting object?
It does.
I think it
On Jul 07, 2010, at 12:50 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:46, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net
wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jul 2010 14:12:17 -0400
Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote:
On Jul 07, 2010, at 07:30 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
Overall, I think that we can make stdlib
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:52 PM, MRAB pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com wrote:
Hi all,
I re-implemented the re module, adding new features and speed
improvements. It's available at:
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/regex
under the name regex so that it can be tried alongside re.
I'd be interested
While looking at a parser module issue
(http://bugs.python.org/issue9154) I noticed that Python's grammar
doesn't permit trailing commas after keyword-only args. That is,
def f(a, b,): pass
is valid syntax, while
def f(*, a, b,): pass
is not. I was just curious whether the latter
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 7:06 AM, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:52 PM, MRAB pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com wrote:
Hi all,
I re-implemented the re module, adding new features and speed
improvements. It's available at:
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/regex
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2010-07-02 - 2010-07-09)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue
number. Do NOT respond to this message.
2813 open (+52) / 18217 closed (+15) / 21030 total (+67)
Open issues with patches: 1133
On 7/9/10 10:40 AM, Mark Dickinson wrote:
While looking at a parser module issue
(http://bugs.python.org/issue9154) I noticed that Python's grammar
doesn't permit trailing commas after keyword-only args. That is,
def f(a, b,): pass
is valid syntax, while
def f(*, a, b,): pass
is
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 02:23:40PM +1000, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Is this is valid ftp url?
# file://ftp.example.com/blah.txt (an ftp URL)
My answer is no. When we have the scheme specifically mentioned as
file:// it is no point in
anatoly techtonik wrote:
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:52 PM, MRAB pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com wrote:
Hi all,
I re-implemented the re module, adding new features and speed
improvements. It's available at:
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/regex
under the name regex so that it can be tried alongside
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:41, Bill Janssen jans...@parc.com wrote:
So, FTP is *not* the default protocol. On the other hand, if host
actually begins with ftp., it's a pretty good guess that FTP will
work.
Actually, FTP *is* the default protocol for most URLs with hostnames in
urllib.py.
Am 09.07.2010 18:36, schrieb Eric Smith:
On 7/9/10 10:40 AM, Mark Dickinson wrote:
While looking at a parser module issue
(http://bugs.python.org/issue9154) I noticed that Python's grammar
doesn't permit trailing commas after keyword-only args. That is,
def f(a, b,): pass
is valid
To be clear, Python 2.x's urllib.urlopen() has this issue; 3.1's
urllib.request.urlopen() rejects non-local hosts in a file URL.
--
Tim Lesher tles...@gmail.com
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
Tim Lesher tles...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:41, Bill Janssen jans...@parc.com wrote:
So, FTP is *not* the default protocol. On the other hand, if host
actually begins with ftp., it's a pretty good guess that FTP will
work.
Actually, FTP *is* the default protocol
On 9 July 2010 19:04, Bill Janssen jans...@parc.com wrote:
If we want to perpetuate these guessing heuristics, I'd suggest using
FTP if the hostname starts with ftp., and HTTP if the hostname starts
with www., and raise an error otherwise.
From what Tim says, it sounds like guessing is only in
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Bill Janssen jans...@parc.com wrote:
I'd suggest that
HTTP is a better (more likely to succeed) default choice in this century.
FTP access also more often reflected the actual file hierarchy of the
machine, so trying that path as a system path is more likely to
Paul Moore wrote:
On 9 July 2010 19:04, Bill Janssen jans...@parc.com wrote:
If we want to perpetuate these guessing heuristics, I'd suggest using
FTP if the hostname starts with ftp., and HTTP if the hostname starts
with www., and raise an error otherwise.
From what Tim says, it sounds like
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:28 AM, MRAB pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com wrote:
anatoly techtonik wrote:
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:52 PM, MRAB pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com wrote:
Hi all,
I re-implemented the re module, adding new features and speed
improvements. It's available at:
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 06:28, Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote:
On Jul 07, 2010, at 12:50 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:46, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net
wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jul 2010 14:12:17 -0400
Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote:
On Jul 07, 2010, at 07:30 PM,
On Jul 09, 2010, at 11:55 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
I think this is going to be something our crazy FLUFL likes but the
kids don't. =)
Don't worry. If you're lucky, you'll get old too. Your eyes will go bad and
your mind will think more about tapioca. By then you might even remember that
the
On 7/9/2010 10:40 AM, Mark Dickinson wrote:
While looking at a parser module issue
(http://bugs.python.org/issue9154) I noticed that Python's grammar
doesn't permit trailing commas after keyword-only args. That is,
def f(a, b,): pass
is valid syntax, while
def f(*, a, b,): pass
Collin Winter wrote:
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:28 AM, MRAB pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com wrote:
anatoly techtonik wrote:
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:52 PM, MRAB pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com wrote:
Hi all,
I re-implemented the re module, adding new features and speed
improvements. It's available at:
Terry wrote:
This violates the important principle that allowed def and call arg
sequences should match to the extent sensible and possible. In this
sense, the SyntaxError is a bug. So I would fix this now for 3.2 and
notify the other implementors.
+1 on fixing it - trailing commas are
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 3:35 PM, MRAB pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com wrote:
I concentrated my efforts on the matching speed because regexes tend to
be compiled only once, and are cached anyway, so I don't think it's as
important.
I think most here will agree with that, but it might be good to keep
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 8:37 PM, Dino Viehland di...@microsoft.com wrote:
Terry wrote:
This violates the important principle that allowed def and call arg
sequences should match to the extent sensible and possible. In this
sense, the SyntaxError is a bug. So I would fix this now for 3.2 and
Am 09.07.2010 22:26, schrieb Mark Dickinson:
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 8:37 PM, Dino Viehland di...@microsoft.com wrote:
Terry wrote:
This violates the important principle that allowed def and call arg
sequences should match to the extent sensible and possible. In this
sense, the SyntaxError is
H as long as we aren't the ones writing the check:)
BJ
--Original Message--
From: Fred Drake fdr...@acm.org
Sent: Fri, July 09, 2010 1:16 PM
To: MRAB pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com
Cc: Python-Dev python-dev@python.org
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] New regex module for 3.2?
On Fri, Jul
On Jul 08, 2010, at 09:14 AM, Georg Brandl wrote:
Am 07.07.2010 23:04, schrieb Georg Brandl:
I can see where this is going... writing it into PEP 384 would
automatically get the change accepted?
I'm definitely not trying to get it in subversively. :)
I hit Send prematurely. I wanted to add
On 7/9/2010 4:26 PM, Mark Dickinson wrote:
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 8:37 PM, Dino Viehlanddi...@microsoft.com wrote:
Terry wrote:
This violates the important principle that allowed def and call arg
sequences should match to the extent sensible and possible. In this
sense, the SyntaxError is a
On Jul 08, 2010, at 01:47 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 07.07.2010 20:40, Barry Warsaw wrote:
Getting back to this after the US holiday. Thanks for running these
numbers Scott. I've opened a bug in the Python tracker and attached
my latest patch:
http://bugs.python.org/issue9193
The one
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 5:31 AM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
This violates the important principle that allowed def and call arg
sequences should match to the extent sensible and possible. In this sense,
the SyntaxError is a bug. So I would fix this now for 3.2 and notify the
other
37 matches
Mail list logo
