On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Petre Galan petre.ga...@gmail.com wrote:
PyNumber_Long is the right interface as it's the right way to do it.
PyNumber_Index allows me to compute a value as index in slicing, value that
may be different that the integer behaviour of object. PyNumber_Index is
I was reading
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms684863%28v=VS.85%29.aspx and
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/89228/how-to-call-external-command-in-python#2251026
when I realized that the process creation flags for subprocess.Popen on
Windows are not specified anywhere in the
On 18/07/2010 00:25, ipatrol6...@yahoo.com wrote:
I was reading
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms684863%28v=VS.85%29.aspx and
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/89228/how-to-call-external-command-in-python#2251026
when I realized that the process creation flags for subprocess.Popen
On 17/07/2010 23:03, Peng Yu wrote:
I don't see that there is a function in the library that mimic the
behavior of 'mkdir -p'. If 'makedirs' is used, it will generate an
error if the file already exists. There are some functions available
on the website to close the gap. But I'd prefer this is
On 17/07/2010 11:03 PM, Peng Yu wrote:
I don't see that there is a function in the library that mimic the
behavior of 'mkdir -p'. If 'makedirs' is used, it will generate an
error if the file already exists. There are some functions available
on the website to close the gap. But I'd prefer this
On 17/07/2010 14:44, Eli Bendersky wrote:
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 16:26, Michael Foord
fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk mailto:fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk wrote:
On 17/07/2010 14:23, Eli Bendersky wrote:
Hello,
I'm currently working, together with Terry Reedy, on improving
the
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Tim Golden m...@timgolden.me.uk wrote:
On 17/07/2010 11:03 PM, Peng Yu wrote:
I don't see that there is a function in the library that mimic the
behavior of 'mkdir -p'. If 'makedirs' is used, it will generate an
error if the file already exists. There are
Hello Mark,
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 00:45:09 +0100
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On 17/07/2010 22:57, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/17/2010 8:41 AM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
IIRC Terry Reedy is also interested in moving IDLE forward.
Interested, yes. But until either a) I can commit
Dear python-dev,
In mathematical notation, f*g = z-f(g(z)) and f^n = f*f*f... (n
times). I often run into situations in python where such operators
could result in cleaner code. Eventually, I decided to implement it
myself and see how it worked in practice.
However, my intuitive implementation
Usual disclaimer: python-dev is for the development *of* python, not
*with*. See python-list, etc.
That said, def declares new functions or methods, so you can't put
arbitrary expressions in there like type(f).__mul__ .
You can usually assign to things like that though, but in this case
you run
Antoine,
You've just saved me from composing essentially the same message. I
am top-posting because I have very little to add.
Mark,
I actually reviewed the issues that got closed thanks to your bumping
them up. That was 30+ issues over the last week or two. Quite
impressive. However, I
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On 17/07/2010 22:57, Terry Reedy wrote:
..
I am certainly reluctant to recruit others to help, as I did for #9222,
if there will be no action indefinitely.
This is standard Python behavour. The worst case I've
On 07/18/2010 05:52 PM, Reid Kleckner wrote:
Usual disclaimer: python-dev is for the development *of* python, not
*with*. See python-list, etc.
Moving to python-list. Please keep discussion there.
That said, def declares new functions or methods, so you can't put
arbitrary expressions in
On 18/07/2010 15:34, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Hello Mark,
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 00:45:09 +0100
Mark Lawrencebreamore...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On 17/07/2010 22:57, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/17/2010 8:41 AM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
IIRC Terry Reedy is also interested in moving IDLE forward.
On Jul 18, 2010, at 1:46 PM, Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
We already have posponed and remind resolutions, but these are
exclusive of accepted. I think there should be a clear way to mark
the issue accepted and would be applied if X.Y was out already.
Chances are one of the resolution
On 18 July 2010 20:57, Glyph Lefkowitz gl...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
On Jul 18, 2010, at 1:46 PM, Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
We already have posponed and remind resolutions, but these are
exclusive of accepted. I think there should be a clear way to mark
the issue accepted and would be
On 18/07/2010 18:46, Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Mark Lawrencebreamore...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On 17/07/2010 22:57, Terry Reedy wrote:
..
I am certainly reluctant to recruit others to help, as I did for #9222,
if there will be no action indefinitely.
This is
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 July 2010 20:57, Glyph Lefkowitz gl...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
..
This is what branches are for.
When the X.Y release cycle starts, there should be a branch for X.Y. Any
would be applied patches can simply be
[Removing idle-dev from CC]
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
..
Maybe going off on a tangent, but I find it frustrating because you (plural)
can't find a given module on the issue tracker. Say I'm looking for issues
relating to smtplib, all I can
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 4:43 AM, Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
I'm extremely offended by your comments. I'll just back off and let the
number of outstanding bugs grow and grow and grow, until such time as people
get fed up with Python and go to (say) Ruby.
Please don't take it
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 4:43 AM, Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk
wrote:
I'm extremely offended by your comments. I'll just back off and let the
number of outstanding bugs grow and grow and grow, until such time as
Hello list, resurrecting a rather old thread from here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-August/091450.html
I've actually come across a use case where faster zipfile decryption
would be very helpful to me (though one could certainly argue that it's
a frivolous case). I'm writing
Maybe going off on a tangent, but I find it frustrating because you
(plural) can't find a given module on the issue tracker. Say I'm looking
for issues relating to smtplib, all I can do is look in the title of the
issue. Have I missed something, or is there a need to have subsections
so that if
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
Maybe going off on a tangent, but I find it frustrating because you
(plural) can't find a given module on the issue tracker. Say I'm looking
for issues relating to smtplib, all I can do is look in the title of the
On 18/07/2010 22:24, Jesse Noller wrote:
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Nick Coghlanncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 4:43 AM, Mark Lawrencebreamore...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
I'm extremely offended by your comments. I'll just back off and let the
number of outstanding bugs
I was looking at the inspect module and noticed that it's source
starts with # -*- coding: iso-8859-1 -*-. I have checked and there
are no non-ascii characters in the file. There are several other
modules that still use the cookie:
Lib/ast.py:# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
Lib/getopt.py:# -*-
Am 18.07.2010 00:45, schrieb Mark Lawrence:
On 17/07/2010 22:57, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/17/2010 8:41 AM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
IIRC Terry Reedy is also interested in moving IDLE forward.
Interested, yes. But until either a) I can commit patches, or b) there
is someone who will respond to
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
..
What am I meant to do when as happened earlier today, I see an issue that
was first raised two years ago, then a year later the OP has asked what if
anything is happening? Leave it? That's a great advert for
Tim Golden wrote:
That said, it's not clear just how far the stdlib should go to
mimic every switch and option of shell commands...
I don't think it's a matter of mimicking switches just because
they're there.
The operation of make sure this directory and all its parents
exist is very
On 7/18/2010 7:42 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
That phrasing implies that there is purpose behind letting issues rot.
Believe me that this is not the case.
This seems like a good place to mention that doc issues have become a
bright spot in the last few years, with a couple of days turnaround not
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 16:44, Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org wrote:
The --help option appears as a hyperlink leading to
http://docs.python.org/dev/py3k/using/cmdline.html#cmdoption--help,
which is
hardly relevant or useful. [...]
-h/:option:`--help`
print a short usage message and
On 7/18/2010 5:05 PM, Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Paul Moorep.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 July 2010 20:57, Glyph Lefkowitzgl...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
..
This is what branches are for.
When the X.Y release cycle starts, there should be a branch for X.Y.
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 05:57, Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 16:44, Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org wrote:
The --help option appears as a hyperlink leading to
http://docs.python.org/dev/py3k/using/cmdline.html#cmdoption--help,
which is
hardly relevant or
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com wrote:
.. So a policy has to be define regarding the
correct usage of these directives/markups, and probably documented in
Doc/documenting/markup.rst
I wonder if in addition to documenting proper markup you could add an
option to
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 06:40, Alexander Belopolsky
alexander.belopol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com wrote:
.. So a policy has to be define regarding the
correct usage of these directives/markups, and probably documented in
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com wrote:
..
However, I wonder what this means for backwards compatibility. Is it valid
to switch trace.py to use the newer command-line argument parsing module
that's only available in the newest versions of Python? I guess it could
In reviewing
http://bugs.python.org/issue9282
the issue came up, where is the unit test for trace.py?
test/test_trace.py is actually a test of the line trace facility of
sys.settrace (and should have been called test_linetrace or
test_settrace). The only trace import Eli could find in Lib/test
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 07:02, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
In reviewing
http://bugs.python.org/issue9282
the issue came up, where is the unit test for trace.py?
test/test_trace.py is actually a test of the line trace facility of
sys.settrace (and should have been called
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 12:12 AM, Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com wrote:
..
stdout output can be captured, but what about the .cover files? Can a Python
unit test create temporary files in tmp/ (or somewhere else) as part of its
testing, or is this forbidden?
That's perfectly fine. Grep in
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 12:21 AM, Alexander Belopolsky
alexander.belopol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 12:12 AM, Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com wrote:
..
stdout output can be captured, but what about the .cover files? Can a Python
unit test create temporary files in tmp/ (or
40 matches
Mail list logo
