Hi,
However small the commit was, I think it still was a feature request, so
I wonder if it was appropriate for the stable versions.
Regards
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Le 20/08/2011 22:52, Paul Moore a écrit :
My buildbot seems to have been failing for a while (I've been away on
holiday) - http://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/buildslaves/moore-windows
The failures seem to generally be in distutils and/or packaging. I see
quite a lot of reds in the waterfall
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 10:17, Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org wrote:
Hi,
However small the commit was, I think it still was a feature request, so
I wonder if it was appropriate for the stable versions.
I can see your point: the reason I committed it also on the stable
branches is that
On 8/21/2011 5:09 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
However small the commit was, I think it still was a feature request, so
I wonder if it was appropriate for the stable versions.
Good catch.
I can see your point: the reason I committed it also on the stable
branches is that .ico are already out
On 8/21/2011 3:12 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 8/21/2011 5:09 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
I can see your point: the reason I committed it also on the stable
branches is that .ico are already out there (since a long time) and
they were currently not recognized. I can call it a bug.
But it is not (a
Scott Dial writes:
On 8/21/2011 3:12 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 8/21/2011 5:09 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
I can see your point: the reason I committed it also on the stable
branches is that .ico are already out there (since a long time) and
they were currently not recognized. I can call
On 8/21/2011 8:10 PM, Scott Dial wrote:
On 8/21/2011 3:12 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
But it is not (a behavior bug). Every feature request 'fixes' what its
proposer considers to be a design bug or something.
What's the feature added? That's a semantic game.
Please. It is an operational
