On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 11:42 AM, martin.v.loewis
python-check...@python.org wrote:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/cddaf96c8149
changeset: 77484:cddaf96c8149
parent: 77482:1f6c23ed8218
user:Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de
date:Sun Jun 17 10:40:16 2012 +0200
Microsoft is now claiming that it will be able to using something called
multi-targeting, later this year.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/vcblog/archive/2012/06/15/10320645.aspx
Interesting. Unlike the re-addition of desktop app support for Express,
which was a purely political decision, this
Hello,
the topic came up on the python-users list today. The raw string syntax
has a minor inconsistency. The ru notation is a syntax error although
we support rb. Neither rb nor ru are supported on Python 2.7.
Python 3.3:
works: r, ur, br, rb
syntax error: ru
Python 2.7:
works: r, ur,
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Christian Heimes li...@cheimes.de wrote:
Hello,
the topic came up on the python-users list today. The raw string syntax
has a minor inconsistency. The ru notation is a syntax error although
we support rb. Neither rb nor ru are supported on Python 2.7.
Python
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 8:33 AM, nick.coghlan
python-check...@python.org wrote:
+ @property
+ def version(self):
+ msg = '%200s has no version specified' % (type(self),)
+ raise NotImplementedError(msg)
+
Shouldn't that be %.200s, rather than %200s?
So, while PEP 414 will allow u to run unmodified, ur will still
need to be changed to something else, because that partially escaped
behaviour isn't available in 3.x and we don't want to reintroduce it.
Given that the PEP currently explicitly supports ur, I think the
reversal of the reversal
On 6/17/2012 10:59 AM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
So, while PEP 414 will allow u to run unmodified, ur will still
need to be changed to something else, because that partially escaped
behaviour isn't available in 3.x and we don't want to reintroduce it.
Given that the PEP currently explicitly
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 3:54 AM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
The premise of the discussion of adding 'u', and of Guido's acceptance, was
that it's about as harmless as they come. I do not remember any discussion
of 'ur' and what it really means in 2.x, and that supporting it meant
Would it make sense to detect and reject these in 3.3 if the 2.7 syntax is
used?
--Guido van Rossum (sent from Android phone)
On Jun 17, 2012 1:13 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 3:54 AM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
The premise of the discussion of
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
Would it make sense to detect and reject these in 3.3 if the 2.7 syntax is
used?
Possibly - I'm trying not to actually *change* any of the internals of
the string literal processing, though. (If I recall the way we
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org
wrote:
Would it make sense to detect and reject these in 3.3 if the 2.7 syntax
is
used?
Possibly - I'm trying not to actually *change* any of the
On 18/06/2012 00:55, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Guido van Rossumgu...@python.org wrote:
Would it make sense to detect and reject these in 3.3 if the 2.7 syntax is
used?
Possibly - I'm trying not to actually *change* any of the internals of
the string literal
Hi,
What's the best way to debug python3 source code?
To fix a bug i need to debug source code(C files).
I use gdb to debug.
But how can i get the exact file/point to fix the bug?
How can i know quickly where the bug is?
How can i run python from gdb and giving input there how can i test and
Martin v. Löwis writes:
(this reminds me of Germany's path wrt. nuclear power
Yeah, except presumably Python won't be buying cheap raw Unicode
support from Perl. ;-)
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
14 matches
Mail list logo
