Brett Cannon wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Eric Snow ericsnowcurren...@gmail.com
mailto:ericsnowcurren...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org
mailto:br...@python.org wrote:
It would also be very easy to expand
On 09.08.2012 01:04, Victor Stinner wrote:
Does Python 3.3 support cross-compilation? There are two new option
for configure: --host and --build, but it's not mentioned in What's
New in Python 3.3.
it does work, but it is only tested for the linux - linux case. the mingw and
macosx cross
How would you feel, if you issued :
import urllib
urlopen(https://server.domain.com;).read()
and the command got you data from some other URL without telling
you! You use firefox, and the site is different than the data you
got! Same with chrome. Safari. Even IE !
Cheated? (Well I was mad
Not so fast. If you make this a language feature you force all Python
implementations to support an identical AST API. That's a big step.
Not that AST manipulation isn't cool -- but I'd like to warn against
over-enthusiasm that might backfire on the language (or its community)
as a whole.
On 8/13/2012 10:45 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Not so fast. If you make this a language feature you force all Python
implementations to support an identical AST API. That's a big step.
I have been wondering about this. One could think from the manuals that
we are there already. From the
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
On 8/13/2012 10:45 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Not so fast. If you make this a language feature you force all Python
implementations to support an identical AST API. That's a big step.
I have been wondering about this.
For documentation, this appears to be for http://bugs.python.org/issue15628
.
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 3:19 PM, andrew.svetlov
python-check...@python.orgwrote:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/1c8a6df94602
changeset: 78547:1c8a6df94602
user:Andrew Svetlov andrew.svet...@gmail.com
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
I see nothing about ast possibly being CPython only. Should there be?
Time to ask the other VMs what they are currently doing (the ast module came
into existence in Python 2.6 so all the VMs should be answer the question
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 1:05 PM, fwierzbi...@gmail.com
fwierzbi...@gmail.com wrote:
2.5+ contains
I should have said *Jython* 2.5+
-Frank
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 1:05 PM, fwierzbi...@gmail.com
fwierzbi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
I see nothing about ast possibly being CPython only. Should there be?
Time to ask the other VMs what they are currently doing (the ast
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 1:05 PM, fwierzbi...@gmail.com
fwierzbi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
I see nothing about ast possibly being CPython only. Should there
On 8/13/2012 4:46 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 1:05 PM,fwierzbi...@gmail.com
fwierzbi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Brett Cannonbr...@python.org wrote:
I see nothing about ast possibly being CPython only. Should there be?
Time to ask the
On Aug 13, 2012 5:22 PM, fwierzbi...@gmail.com fwierzbi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 1:05 PM, fwierzbi...@gmail.com
fwierzbi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Brett Cannon
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 5:13 PM, brian.curtin
python-check...@python.org wrote:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/256bfee696c5
changeset: 78552:256bfee696c5
parent: 78549:edcbf3edf701
parent: 78551:fcad4566910b
user:Brian Curtin br...@python.org
date:Mon Aug 13
Implementations are currently required to *have* an AST (or else declare
non compliance with that particular flag to compile). They're definitely
not required to have the *same* AST, thus all AST manipulation, like
bytecode manipulation, is necessarily implementation dependent.
We don't even
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
Direct. There is an AST grammar file that gets compiled into C and Python
objects which are used by the compiler (c version) or exposed to users
(Python version).
At the risk of making you repeat yourself, and just to be
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 6:35 PM, fwierzbi...@gmail.com
fwierzbi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
Direct. There is an AST grammar file that gets compiled into C and Python
objects which are used by the compiler (c version) or exposed
On 14/08/12 06:46, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 1:05 PM, fwierzbi...@gmail.com
fwierzbi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Brett Cannonbr...@python.org wrote:
I see nothing about ast possibly being CPython only. Should there be?
Time to ask the other
Thanks Brett, that cleared everything up for me! And indeed it is what
I'm thinking of doing for Jython (Minimal nodes for the compiler and
parallel PyObjects for Python).
-Frank
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
Brett Cannon brett at python.org writes:
Time to ask the other VMs what they are currently doing (the ast module came
into existence in Python 2.6 so all the VMs should be answer the question since
Jython is in alpha for 2.7 compatibility).
As far as I know PyPy supports the ast module,
20 matches
Mail list logo
