Does anybody know if http://vote.python.org is already operational?
I decided to start a separate thread for TransformDict name, because I
want to change it.
Current implementation of PEP 455 only touches dictionary keys and it
is more narrow than the name suggests. I'd reserve TransformDict name
This bug has been reported as http://bugs.python.org/issue18307 over a
month ago
Аnd I've found out the root cause of this issue so far. Unit-test and patch
are suggested.
Without patch test fails, with patch - passed.
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Vitaly Murashev wrote:
> Dear Python deve
On 16 September 2013 00:45, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
> 15.09.13 16:57, Antoine Pitrou написав(ла):
>
>> I don't really care. What's the point in the end? TransformDict is
>> non-trivial to implement, while the so-called "TransformSet" is just a
>> dict with a different API.
>
>
> I don't see a diff
On Sun, 15 Sep 2013 17:45:00 +0300
Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
> 15.09.13 16:57, Antoine Pitrou написав(ла):
> > I don't really care. What's the point in the end? TransformDict is
> > non-trivial to implement, while the so-called "TransformSet" is just a
> > dict with a different API.
>
> I don't see
15.09.13 16:57, Antoine Pitrou написав(ла):
I don't really care. What's the point in the end? TransformDict is
non-trivial to implement, while the so-called "TransformSet" is just a
dict with a different API.
I don't see a difference. To me TransformDict is just a dict (or two).
_
On 16 September 2013 00:19, Ethan Furman wrote:
> Three questions:
>
>
> Would the new __initclass__ function be usable with actual full-blown
> metaclasses?
Sure (as long as the metaclass in question called it at the
appropriate time, which those inheriting from type would do
automatically)).
>
Three questions:
Would the new __initclass__ function be usable with actual full-blown
metaclasses?
The PEP says this:
If present on the created object, this new hook will be called by the class
creation machinery after the __class__ reference has been initialised.
Given that statement,
I see PEP 428 is both targeted at 3.4 and still in draft status.
What remains to be done to ask for pronouncement?
--
~Ethan~
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://ma
Yes, but I'm not interested to write such doc.
Victor
Le 15 sept. 2013 10:34, "Georg Brandl" a écrit :
> On 08/28/2013 01:20 AM, victor.stinner wrote:
> > http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/ef889c3d5dc6
> > changeset: 85420:ef889c3d5dc6
> > user:Victor Stinner
> > date:Wed Aug 2
On Sun, 15 Sep 2013 16:14:24 +0300
Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
> 15.09.13 14:23, Antoine Pitrou написав(ла):
> > On Sun, 15 Sep 2013 13:56:26 +0900
> > Larry Hastings wrote:
> >> On 09/14/2013 07:30 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 14 Sep 2013 14:33:56 +0900
> >>> Larry Hastings wrote:
>
15.09.13 14:23, Antoine Pitrou написав(ла):
On Sun, 15 Sep 2013 13:56:26 +0900
Larry Hastings wrote:
On 09/14/2013 07:30 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Sat, 14 Sep 2013 14:33:56 +0900
Larry Hastings wrote:
Whenever I read a discussion about the dict, I always wonder whether the
same thing appl
On Sun, 15 Sep 2013 13:56:26 +0900
Larry Hastings wrote:
> On 09/14/2013 07:30 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> > On Sat, 14 Sep 2013 14:33:56 +0900
> > Larry Hastings wrote:
> >> Whenever I read a discussion about the dict, I always wonder whether the
> >> same thing applies to a set. Have you consi
On 08/28/2013 01:20 AM, victor.stinner wrote:
> http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/ef889c3d5dc6
> changeset: 85420:ef889c3d5dc6
> user:Victor Stinner
> date:Wed Aug 28 00:53:59 2013 +0200
> summary:
> Issue #18571: Implementation of the PEP 446: file descriptors and file
> handl
13 matches
Mail list logo
