On 2 November 2013 08:44, Eric Snow ericsnowcurren...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
Thanks for the clarification. It all SGTM.
I've updated the PEP and the reference implementation.
While I was saying loader when I should have been
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 5:46 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 November 2013 08:44, Eric Snow ericsnowcurren...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
Thanks for the clarification. It all SGTM.
I've updated the PEP and the
On 3 November 2013 01:21, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 5:46 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
For the same reason, I also have a mild preference for target (or
the more explicit load_target) as the name, although I won't object
if you and Brett prefer
In article 3dbmq94f4bz7...@mail.python.org,
jason.coombs python-check...@python.org wrote:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/7d399099334d
changeset: 86861:7d399099334d
branch: 3.2
user:Jason R. Coombs jar...@jaraco.com
date:Sat Nov 02 13:00:01 2013 -0400
summary:
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
Eric: since target was on both Brett's list and mine, it looks like
s/existing/target/ and clarifying that incompatible target module
should be reported by throwing ImportError from find_spec() will get
you the
