Greetings.
I'm sorry if I'm too insistent, but it's not truly rewarding to
constantly improve a patch that no one appears to need. Again, I
understand people are busy working and/or reviewing critical patches,
but 2 months of inactivity is not right. Yes, I posted a message
yesterday, but no one
https://github.com/nickstenning/honcho/pull/121
--
anatoly t.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://bugs.python.org/issue22619
Possible implementation of negative limit for traceback functions
I see that Serhiy Storchaka reviewed a patch.
Victor
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
More context:
2014-12-19 12:43 GMT+01:00 anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com:
https://github.com/nickstenning/honcho/pull/121
The link mentions the following changeset:
---
changeset: 93122:1a3143752db2
branch: 2.7
parent: 93112:927cca0b9337
user:R David Murray
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 8:52 AM, Dmitry Kazakov jsb...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings.
I'm sorry if I'm too insistent, but it's not truly rewarding to
constantly improve a patch that no one appears to need. Again, I
understand people are busy working and/or reviewing critical patches,
but 2
Thank you for pointing this out. That's what I meant when I asked to
say what's wrong with it :-) I fixed the latest patch and uploaded
it.
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 7:48 AM, Stefan Ring stefan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 8:52 AM, Dmitry Kazakov jsb...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings.
On 5 January 2015 at 18:17, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 January 2015 at 01:20, Steve Dower steve.do...@microsoft.com wrote:
I think this means the best way to make multiple versions work properly is
to rename python.exe to python3.5.exe, then install the launcher as
python.exe
On 6 January 2015 at 13:56, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
If we can't get PATH sorted out, we need to do something about this,
IMO. I don't know what (believe me, I tried to find a solution)
unfortunately.
I personally believe we should aim to make the Windows section in
the above
On Tue, 6 Jan 2015 23:56:30 +1000
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 January 2015 at 18:17, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 January 2015 at 01:20, Steve Dower steve.do...@microsoft.com wrote:
I think this means the best way to make multiple versions work properly is
to
On 7 January 2015 at 00:12, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2015 23:56:30 +1000
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
pip is problematic on Linux as well (due to the pip/pip3 split at
the system level). Hence this section in the stdlib docs:
There's an obligatory XKCD reference for this: http://xkcd.com/1172/
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
On 1/6/2015 7:39 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
More context:
2014-12-19 12:43 GMT+01:00 anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com:
On 1/6/2015 7:39 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
More context:
2014-12-19 12:43 GMT+01:00 anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com:
https://github.com/nickstenning/honcho/pull/121
The link mentions the following changeset:
---
changeset: 93122:1a3143752db2
branch: 2.7
parent:
I thought of this exact comment when I read the bug fix considered a
regression.
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
There's an obligatory XKCD reference for this: http://xkcd.com/1172/
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
There's a proof of concept patch in http://bugs.python.org/issue22906, but
it doesn't have the __future__ import and probably gets other details wrong.
Reference:
PEP 479 -- Change StopIteration handling inside generators
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0479/
--
--Guido van Rossum
14 matches
Mail list logo
