On Apr 3, 2015 5:50 PM, "Donald Stufft" wrote:
>
>
> > On Apr 3, 2015, at 6:38 PM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> >
> > On 04.04.2015 00:14, Steve Dower wrote:
> >> The thing is, that's exactly the same goodness as Authenticode gives,
except everyone gets that for free and meanwhile you're the only one w
> On Apr 3, 2015, at 6:38 PM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>
> On 04.04.2015 00:14, Steve Dower wrote:
>> The thing is, that's exactly the same goodness as Authenticode gives, except
>> everyone gets that for free and meanwhile you're the only one who has
>> admitted to using GPG on Windows :)
>>
>>
On 04.04.2015 00:14, Steve Dower wrote:
> The thing is, that's exactly the same goodness as Authenticode gives, except
> everyone gets that for free and meanwhile you're the only one who has
> admitted to using GPG on Windows :)
>
> Basically, what I want to hear is that GPG sigs provide signifi
The thing is, that's exactly the same goodness as Authenticode gives, except
everyone gets that for free and meanwhile you're the only one who has admitted
to using GPG on Windows :)
Basically, what I want to hear is that GPG sigs provide significantly better
protection than hashes (and I can p
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> That means I'm now OK with monkeypatching __build_class__ being the
> only way to get dynamic hooking of the class currently being defined
> from the class body - folks that really want that behaviour can
> monkeypatch it in, while folks that t
On 4/3/2015 5:51 AM, Narsu wrote:
Hi Python
I'm working on a game project,using c++ as main
language, and using python as script.I've built
the Python from the source code on Windows, and when I
invoked method Py_Initialize my program exited. After some tests
I realized as long as I move the Pyt
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Extending the descriptor protocol to include a per-descriptor hook that's
> called at class definition time sounds like a potentially nice way to go to
> me. While you *could* still use it to arbitrarily mutate the class object,
> it's much cl
On 03.04.2015 19:35, Steve Dower wrote:
>> My Windows development days are firmly behind me. So I don't really have an
>> opinion here. So I put it to you, Windows Python developers: do you care
>> about
>> GnuPG signatures on Windows-specific files? Or do you not care?
>
> The later replies seem
Larry Hastings wrote:
> Steve's also changed the authentication process. His new installers rely on a
> Windows digital signature technology called Authenticode where the signature
> is
> built right into the .exe file. Windows platforms will automatically
> authenticate executables signed with Au
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2015-03-27 - 2015-04-03)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open4838 (+19)
closed 30782 (+50)
total 35620 (+69)
Open issues wit
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Martin Teichmann
wrote:
> This proposal can actually be seen as an extension to the __class__
> and super() mechanism of normal methods: methods currently have the
> priviledge to know which classes they are defined in, while descriptors
> don't. So we could unify a
On 4 Apr 2015 00:29, "Martin Teichmann" wrote:
>
> > When I first wrote PEP 422 I was of the view that "Python 2 allows
> > class definition postprocessing injection, we should allow it in
> > Python 3 as well". I've since changed my view to "Having to declare
> > post-processing of a class defini
Hi Python
I'm working on a game project,using c++ as main
language, and using python as script.I've built
the Python from the source code on Windows, and when I
invoked method Py_Initialize my program exited. After some tests
I realized as long as I move the Python-2.7.9/Lib file
to my program fi
> When I first wrote PEP 422 I was of the view that "Python 2 allows
> class definition postprocessing injection, we should allow it in
> Python 3 as well". I've since changed my view to "Having to declare
> post-processing of a class definition up front as a decorator, base
> class or metaclass is
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 7:25 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On 3 April 2015 at 10:56, Larry Hastings wrote:
>> My Windows development days are firmly behind me. So I don't really have an
>> opinion here. So I put it to you, Windows Python developers: do you care
>> about GnuPG signatures on Windows-spe
On Apr 03, 2015, at 02:56 AM, Larry Hastings wrote:
>My Windows development days are firmly behind me. So I don't really have an
>opinion here. So I put it to you, Windows Python developers: do you care
>about GnuPG signatures on Windows-specific files? Or do you not care?
They're not mutually
On 3 April 2015 at 10:56, Larry Hastings wrote:
> My Windows development days are firmly behind me. So I don't really have an
> opinion here. So I put it to you, Windows Python developers: do you care
> about GnuPG signatures on Windows-specific files? Or do you not care?
I don't have a very s
Oh, I forgot to explain that the problem is even more important in the
SSL module. In SSL, a single "recv()" may require to *send* data. The
SSL protocol is more complex and may require multiple OpenSSL calls
which imply multiple send/recv syscalls.
I wrote a patch for the ssl module to implement
Hi,
I reworked the socket and ssl modules to better handle signals (to
implement the PEP 475, retry on EINTR). These changes require to
recompute timeout because syscalls are calling in a loop until it
doesn't with EINTR (or EWOULDBLOCK or EGAIN). Most socket methods exit
when the underlying sysca
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 02:56:53AM -0700, Larry Hastings wrote:
> So I put it to you, Windows Python developers: do you care
> about GnuPG signatures on Windows-specific files? Or do you not care?
Developer using python on windows here. I care, yes.
It's valuable and significant to be able to a
On 03.04.2015 11:56, Larry Hastings wrote:
> My Windows development days are firmly behind me. So I don't really have an
> opinion here. So I put
> it to you, Windows Python developers: do you care about GnuPG signatures on
> Windows-specific files?
> Or do you not care?
Regardless of target
As of Python 3.5 Steve Dower has taken over the Windows builds of Python
from Martin van Loewis. He's also taken over for 2.7--though Martin's
still doing builds for 3.4.
For both versions, Steve is using all-new tooling for the build
process. The output is different, too; he's producing
On 3 April 2015 at 18:21, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> That means I'm now OK with monkeypatching __build_class__ being the
> only way to get dynamic hooking of the class currently being defined
> from the class body - folks that really want that behaviour can
> monkeypatch it in, while folks that think i
On 3 April 2015 at 11:32, PJ Eby wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 6:24 PM, Martin Teichmann
> wrote:
>> The whole point of PEP 487 was to reduce PEP 422 so much that
>> it can be written in python and back-ported.
>
> As I said earlier, it's a fine feature and should be in the stdlib for
> Python
24 matches
Mail list logo
