On 29 July 2015 at 02:17, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com writes:
On 28 July 2015 at 13:35, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
People can, do, and probably must make many decisions through
non-rational processes. I don't propose to
On Jul 28, 2015 10:41 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull step...@xemacs.org wrote:
Ben Finney writes:
I've made a clear distinction between the need to *be able to*
justify a change, versus arbitrary demands to do so by arbitrary
members.
The latter is what you're arguing against, and of
On 07/29/2015 09:18 AM, Wes Turner wrote:
sorry, I haven't the context for this
tl;dr -- Mock objects now protect against accidentally accessing wrong assert methods by raising an attribute error; this is different than past behavior in that any attribute that didn't exist
simply returned a
Brett Cannon brett at python.org writes:
Should we discuss of these are the benchmarks we want daily reports on
(you can see what the benchmark suite has at
https://hg.python.org/benchmarks/file/2979f5ce6a0c/perf.py#l2243 )? I
personally would prefer dropping pybench and replacing it with
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:40 AM Catalin G. Manciu
catalin.gabriel.man...@intel.com
[SNIP -- stuff came back as visible HTML; hopefully I didn't miss something]
Thank you for your feedback! We value the community’s input and we would
like to provide the most relevant results in our automatic
[Lennart Regebro]
\ I have yet to see a use case for that.
[Tim]
Of course you have. When you address them, you usually dismiss them
as calendar operations (IIRC).
'[Lennart]
Those are not usecases for this broken behaviour.
I agree there is a usecase for where you want to add one day to
On 28 Jul 2015, at 03:13, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/27/2015 06:11 PM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
Treating time as UTC with conversions at the application edge might
be cleaner in some sense, but can make code harder to
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 06:26:44 +0200, Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:26 PM, Tim Peters tim.pet...@gmail.com wrote:
I have yet to see a use case for that.
Of course you have. When you address them, you usually dismiss them
as calendar operations (IIRC).
