Re: [Python-Dev] frame evaluation API PEP

2016-06-19 Thread Mark Shannon
On 19/06/16 18:29, Brett Cannon wrote: On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 at 21:49 Guido van Rossum > wrote: Hi Brett, I've got a few questions about the specific design. Probably you know the answers, it would be nice to have them in the PEP. Once

Re: [Python-Dev] frame evaluation API PEP

2016-06-19 Thread Guido van Rossum
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Brett Cannon wrote: > > > On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 at 21:49 Guido van Rossum wrote: > >> Hi Brett, >> >> I've got a few questions about the specific design. Probably you know the >> answers, it would be nice to have them in the

Re: [Python-Dev] frame evaluation API PEP

2016-06-19 Thread MRAB
On 2016-06-20 02:29, Brett Cannon wrote: On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 at 21:49 Guido van Rossum > wrote: [snip] Could you figure out some other way to store per-code-object data? It seems you considered this but decided that the co_extra field was

Re: [Python-Dev] frame evaluation API PEP

2016-06-19 Thread Brett Cannon
On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 at 21:49 Guido van Rossum wrote: > Hi Brett, > > I've got a few questions about the specific design. Probably you know the > answers, it would be nice to have them in the PEP. > Once you're happy with my answers I'll update the PEP. > > First, why not

Re: [Python-Dev] security SIG?

2016-06-19 Thread Guido van Rossum
I think it's fine to have this SIG. I could see it going different ways in terms of discussions and membership, but it's definitely worth a try. I don't like clever names, and I very much doubt that it'll be mistaken for an address to report sensitive issues, so I think it should just be

Re: [Python-Dev] security SIG?

2016-06-19 Thread Ethan Furman
On 06/19/2016 12:39 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: On 18 June 2016 at 10:36, Ethan Furman wrote: To sum up: I think it would be a good idea. I'm coming around to this point of view as well. import-sig, for example, is a very low traffic SIG, but I think it serves three key useful purposes: - it

Re: [Python-Dev] security SIG?

2016-06-19 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 18 June 2016 at 10:36, Ethan Furman wrote: > One of the big advantages of a SIG is the much reduced pool of participants, > and that those participants are usually interested in forward progress. It > would also be helpful to have a single person both champion and act as >

Re: [Python-Dev] Discussion overload

2016-06-19 Thread Kevin Ollivier
Hi Nick, On 6/17/16, 6:12 PM, "Nick Coghlan" wrote: >On 16 June 2016 at 19:00, Kevin Ollivier wrote: >> Hi Guido, >> >> From: on behalf of Guido van Rossum >> >> Reply-To: >> Date: