> On Feb 2, 2017, at 2:17 AM, Anders Munch wrote:
>
> Give Python 2 a little more credit.
We are, it told you what your issue was: yield outside a function. Consider:
>>> def f():
... l = [(yield 1) for x in range(10)]
... print(l)
>>> gen = f()
>>> for i in range(11):
... ge
Craig Rodrigues :
> Make this return a list on Python 3, like in Python 2: [(yield 1) for x in
> range(10)]
Give Python 2 a little more credit.
Python 2.7.10 (default, May 23 2015, 09:40:32) [MSC v.1500 32 bit (Intel)] on
win32
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more informa
2017-02-02 22:24 GMT+01:00 Maciej Szulik :
> Ezio confirmed pushing all the changes to bugs.python.org already.
> I'm very sorry for all the inconvenience caused by previous mistakes. If
> your
> issues was closed make sure to verify it was closed properly and re-open if
> needed.
Don't worry. Bre
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Victor Stinner
wrote:
> 2017-02-01 18:32 GMT+01:00 Victor Stinner :
> > To finish with an empty change:
>
> Information on IRC:
>
> Known issue: http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue611
>
> "Maciej is working on it"
>
> Good & thanks!
>
>
I just fixed
On 2017-02-02 04:37, Franklin? Lee wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Sven R. Kunze wrote:
Hi folks,
I recently refreshed regular expressions theoretical basics *indulging in
reminiscences* So, I read https://swtch.com/~rsc/regexp/regexp1.html
However, reaching the chart in the lower thi
2017-02-01 18:32 GMT+01:00 Victor Stinner :
> To finish with an empty change:
Information on IRC:
Known issue: http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue611
"Maciej is working on it"
Good & thanks!
Victor
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-De
> On 2 Feb 2017, at 03:38, Stephen J. Turnbull
> wrote:
>
> Cory Benfield writes:
>
>> The TL;DR is: I understand Christian’s concern, but I don’t think
>> it’s important if you’re very, very careful.
>
> But AIUI, the "you" above is the end-user or admin of end-user's
> system, no? We know
Oh, I noticed another strange thing:
The Roundup Robot closed the issue http://bugs.python.org/issue29368
but I don't see any explicit "Close issue #xxx" or "Close #xxx" in the
commit message of the two commits.
Is it deliberate to close an issue after any commit?
Victor
2017-01-31 19:18 GMT+01
Thanks, Ivan.
I confirmed 3000 negative cache entries were removed by your patch!
https://gist.github.com/methane/3c34f11fb677365a7e92afe73aca24e7
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 1:16 AM, Ivan Levkivskyi wrote:
> Inada-san,
>
> I have made a PR for typing module upstream
> https://github.com/python/ty
