Re: [Python-Dev] bugs.python.org updated

2017-09-27 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 6:54 PM, Ezio Melotti wrote: > > This update included ~300 changesets from upstream and required an > additional ~30 to update our instances and our fork of Roundup. A number > of features that we added to our fork over the years have been ported > upstream and they have

[Python-Dev] bugs.python.org updated

2017-09-27 Thread Ezio Melotti
Hi, yesterday I updated the version of Roundup used to run our bugs.python.org instance and 4 other instances (the meta, jython, setuptools, and roundup trackers). If everything went right you shouldn't have noticed anything different :) This update included ~300 changesets from upstream and

Re: [Python-Dev] API design question: how to extend sys.settrace()?

2017-09-27 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 28 September 2017 at 06:23, George King wrote: > Victor, thank you for starting this conversation. Nick, I just looked at your > patch and I think it is a better solution than mine, because it does not > involve adding to or changing the sys API. I will close my pull

Re: [Python-Dev] API design question: how to extend sys.settrace()?

2017-09-27 Thread George King
Victor, thank you for starting this conversation. Nick, I just looked at your patch and I think it is a better solution than mine, because it does not involve adding to or changing the sys API. I will close my pull request. The reason for my interest in this area is that I’m experimenting with

Re: [Python-Dev] New security-annou...@python.org mailing list

2017-09-27 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Sep 27, 2017, at 12:24, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > Can we add redirects to the old list locations? I’m not sure we need it for security-announce given how new that list is and that we only have one message to it. I’ve forwarded this request to postmaster@ though.

Re: [Python-Dev] API design question: how to extend sys.settrace()?

2017-09-27 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 27 September 2017 at 22:56, Victor Stinner wrote: > Hi, > > In bpo-29400, it was proposed to add the ability to trace not only > function calls but also instructions at the bytecode level. I like the > idea, but I don't see how to extend sys.settrace() to add a new >

Re: [Python-Dev] New security-annou...@python.org mailing list

2017-09-27 Thread Guido van Rossum
Can we add redirects to the old list locations? On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Roberto Martínez < robertomartin...@gmail.com> wrote: > I can't see the lists either. Same message "No such list > security-announce". > > Cheers. > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017, 18:05 Jesus Cea wrote: > >>

Re: [Python-Dev] New security-annou...@python.org mailing list

2017-09-27 Thread Roberto Martínez
I can't see the lists either. Same message "No such list security-announce". Cheers. On Wed, Sep 27, 2017, 18:05 Jesus Cea wrote: > On 21/09/17 17:30, Barry Warsaw wrote: > > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/security-announce > > "No such list security-announce". > > >

Re: [Python-Dev] New security-annou...@python.org mailing list

2017-09-27 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Sep 27, 2017, at 11:56, Jesus Cea wrote: > > On 21/09/17 17:30, Barry Warsaw wrote: >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/security-announce > > "No such list security-announce". > >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/security-sig > > "No such list security-sig".

Re: [Python-Dev] New security-annou...@python.org mailing list

2017-09-27 Thread Jesus Cea
On 21/09/17 17:30, Barry Warsaw wrote: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/security-announce "No such list security-announce". > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/security-sig "No such list security-sig". -- Jesús Cea Avión _/_/ _/_/_/_/_/_/

Re: [Python-Dev] API design question: how to extend sys.settrace()?

2017-09-27 Thread Guido van Rossum
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 8:10 AM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote: > I afraid that this change breaks an assumption in frame_setlineno() about > the state of the stack. This can corrupt the stack if you jump from the > instruction which is a part of Python operation. For example

Re: [Python-Dev] API design question: how to extend sys.settrace()?

2017-09-27 Thread Serhiy Storchaka
27.09.17 15:56, Victor Stinner пише: In bpo-29400, it was proposed to add the ability to trace not only function calls but also instructions at the bytecode level. I like the idea, but I don't see how to extend sys.settrace() to add a new "trace_instructions: bool" optional (keyword-only?)

Re: [Python-Dev] API design question: how to extend sys.settrace()?

2017-09-27 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
On 09/27/2017 02:56 PM, Victor Stinner wrote: Hi, In bpo-29400, it was proposed to add the ability to trace not only function calls but also instructions at the bytecode level. I like the idea, but I don't see how to extend sys.settrace() to add a new "trace_instructions: bool" optional

[Python-Dev] API design question: how to extend sys.settrace()?

2017-09-27 Thread Victor Stinner
Hi, In bpo-29400, it was proposed to add the ability to trace not only function calls but also instructions at the bytecode level. I like the idea, but I don't see how to extend sys.settrace() to add a new "trace_instructions: bool" optional (keyword-only?) parameter without breaking the backward