On Monday, October 23, 2017, Thomas Jollans wrote:
> On 22/10/17 17:06, Wes Turner wrote:
> > There are current applications with greater-than nanosecond precision:
> >
> > - relativity experiments
> > - particle experiments
> >
> > Must they always use their own implementations of time., datetim
If one simply replaces the 'T' with a space and trims it after the '.',
IIRC, it parses fine.
-- H
On Oct 23, 2017 15:16, "Mike Miller" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could anyone put this five year-old bug about parsing iso8601 format
> date-times on the front burner?
>
> http://bugs.python.org/issue1587
On 22/10/17 17:06, Wes Turner wrote:
> There are current applications with greater-than nanosecond precision:
>
> - relativity experiments
> - particle experiments
>
> Must they always use their own implementations of time., datetime.
> __init__, fromordinal, fromtimestamp ?!
>
> - https://schol
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 1:42 PM, Wes Turner wrote:
> Aligning simulation data in context to other events may be enlightening:
> is there a good library for handing high precision time units in Python
> (and/or CFFI)?
>
Well, numpy's datetime64 can be set to use (almost) whatever unit you want:
Hi,
Could anyone put this five year-old bug about parsing iso8601 format date-times
on the front burner?
http://bugs.python.org/issue15873
In the comments there's a lot of hand-wringing about different variations that
bogged it down, but right now I only need it to handle the output of
Hi all,
I've giving a talk on the history of PyCon at PyCon UK this weekend. I'd
love to include some photos from the early conferences but alas most of the
links I've found on the web are stale and broken.
If anyone has pictures, or valid links to such pictures, I'd be delighted
to hear about th
