Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 575 (Unifying function/method classes) update

Hi Jeroen. It's interesting, but I think we need reference implementation to compare it's benefit with it's complexity. Victor had tried to add `tp_fastcall` slot, but he suspended his effort because it's benefit is not enough for it's complexity. https://bugs.python.org/issue29259 I think if

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 575 (Unifying function/method classes) update

> On 17 Jun 2018, at 16:31, Stefan Behnel wrote: > > Ronald Oussoren schrieb am 17.06.2018 um 14:50: >> Why did you add a tp_ccalloffset slot to the type with the actual >> information in instances instead of storing the information in a slot? > > If the configuration of the callable was in

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 575 (Unifying function/method classes) update

On 2018-06-17 14:50, Ronald Oussoren wrote: This looks interesting. Why did you add a tp_ccalloffset slot to the type with the actual information in instances instead of storing the information in a slot? Think of built-in functions. Every built-in function is a different callable and calls

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 575 (Unifying function/method classes) update

Ronald Oussoren schrieb am 17.06.2018 um 14:50: > Why did you add a tp_ccalloffset slot to the type with the actual information > in instances instead of storing the information in a slot? If the configuration of the callable was in the type, you would need a separate type for each kind of

Re: [Python-Dev] Some data points for the "annual release cadence" concept

> On 15 Jun 2018, at 13:00, Nick Coghlan wrote: > > On 14 June 2018 at 06:30, Ronald Oussoren > wrote: >> On 13 Jun 2018, at 15:42, Nick Coghlan > > wrote: >> >> Yeah, pretty much - once we can get to the point where it's routine for

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 575 (Unifying function/method classes) update

> On 17 Jun 2018, at 11:00, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > Hello, > > I have been working on a slightly different PEP to use a new type slot > tp_ccalloffset instead the base_function base class. You can see the work in > progress here: > > https://github.com/jdemeyer/PEP-ccall > > By

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 575 (Unifying function/method classes) update

On 17 June 2018 at 19:00, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > Hello, > > I have been working on a slightly different PEP to use a new type slot > tp_ccalloffset instead the base_function base class. You can see the work in > progress here: > > https://github.com/jdemeyer/PEP-ccall > > By creating a new

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 575 (Unifying function/method classes) update

Hello, I have been working on a slightly different PEP to use a new type slot tp_ccalloffset instead the base_function base class. You can see the work in progress here: https://github.com/jdemeyer/PEP-ccall By creating a new protocol that each class can implement, there is a full

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 575 (Unifying function/method classes) update

Having had some time to let this settle for a bit, I hope it doesn't get abandoned just because it was to complicated to come to a conclusion. I'd like to attempt to summarize the main ideas as follows. 1) Currently the "fast call" optimization is implemented by by checking explicitly for a set