On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 04:56 Paul Moore wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 12:24, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> > For some reason it seems to be located in a hidden directory
> > (".github/appveyor.yml"). Not the most intuitive decision IMHO.
> > Travis' own config file ".travis.yml" is still at repositor
On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 18:28, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
> There is a closed issue for this: https://bugs.python.org/issue22515.
>
Oh, thanks, I had missed that. I guess I can live with it, although I agree
with [the last comment][1] that this decision does not make a lot of sense.
But hey, who am I
05.09.18 13:10, Evpok Padding пише:
According to the [doc][1], `collections.Counter` convenience
intersection and union functions are meant to help it represent
multisets. However, it currently lacks comparisons, which would make
sense and seems straightforward to implement.
Am I missing somet
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 3:13 AM Evpok Padding
wrote:
> According to the [doc][1], `collections.Counter` convenience intersection
> and union functions are meant to help it represent multisets. However, it
> currently lacks comparisons, which would make sense and seems
> straightforward to implemen
Sorry, allow me to ask one more thing.
If I want to use AES in zipfile module, what the good way to implement?
Thanks and Regards,
-
Takahiro Ono
2018年9月5日(水) 23:01 大野隆弘 :
> Christian, really appreciated the details. I understood.
>
> Is wrapper library like ssl module with open
Christian, really appreciated the details. I understood.
Is wrapper library like ssl module with openssl on platform also not good
idea?
My intention is not re-invention but single standard way as standard
library.
If I can read past discussion somewhere, it's also appreciated
Thanks and Regard
On 2018-09-05 16:01, 大野隆弘 wrote:
> Christian, really appreciated the details. I understood.
>
> Is wrapper library like ssl module with openssl on platform also not
> good idea?
> My intention is not re-invention but single standard way as standard
> library.
>
> If I can read past discussion so
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 4:32 PM Paul Moore wrote:
>
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 14:47, Zachary Ware
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 6:23 AM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> > > On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 11:03:48 +0100
> > > Paul Moore wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 10:55, Victor Stinner wrote:
> > >
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 9:30 AM Paul Moore wrote:
> I presume you're suggesting keeping 2017 is so that we don't have
> stray 2015-built artifacts in the cache, which makes sense to me, and
> I have a mild preference for keeping the latest compiler, as that's
> likely the one that people will find
On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 14:47, Zachary Ware wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 6:23 AM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> > On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 11:03:48 +0100
> > Paul Moore wrote:
> > > On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 10:55, Victor Stinner wrote:
> > > > Who ows the "python" AppVeyor project?
>
> That seems to have fa
On Sun, 26 Aug 2018 at 12:16, David Bolen wrote:
> I'm not sure if there's any better way for Python to detect a remote
> shell as being interactive under Windows that would cover such cases.
> Perhaps some of the newer pty changes I read Microsoft is making might
> help, assuming it flows through
Le mer. 5 sept. 2018 à 15:47, Zachary Ware
a écrit :
> For the actual issue at hand, the problem arises from doing builds on
> 3.6 with both the VS2015 and VS2017 images. Apparently something
> built in `/externals` by the VS2015 build gets cached, which then
> breaks the VS2017 build; I haven't
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 6:23 AM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 11:03:48 +0100
> Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 10:55, Victor Stinner wrote:
> > > Who ows the "python" AppVeyor project?
That seems to have fallen to me for the most part.
> > > Can someone please give me t
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 12:55 PM Victor Stinner wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It's no longer possible to merge any change in the 3.6 branch of
> CPython, because the AppVeyor job fails:
> https://bugs.python.org/issue34575
>
> It seems like AppVeyor has a build cache and this cache is outdated. I
> tried to u
I wrote some notes about our CIs. Link to AppVeyor notes:
https://pythondev.readthedocs.io/ci.html#appveyor
Victor
Le mer. 5 sept. 2018 à 12:04, Paul Moore a écrit :
>
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 10:55, Victor Stinner wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > It's no longer possible to merge any change in the 3.6
On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 12:24, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> For some reason it seems to be located in a hidden directory
> (".github/appveyor.yml"). Not the most intuitive decision IMHO.
> Travis' own config file ".travis.yml" is still at repository root, which
> makes things more confusing.
Thanks, ag
On 9/5/2018 6:22 AM, Christian Heimes wrote:
On 2018-09-05 11:56, Victor Stinner wrote:
Hi,
Someone asked somewhere (oops, I forgot where!) when is Python 3.7.1
scheduled. I wanted to reply when I saw that it was scheduled for 2
months ago:
"3.7.1: 2018-07-xx"
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/p
On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 11:03:48 +0100
Paul Moore wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 10:55, Victor Stinner wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > It's no longer possible to merge any change in the 3.6 branch of
> > CPython, because the AppVeyor job fails:
> > https://bugs.python.org/issue34575
> >
> > It seems like
On 2018-09-05 11:56, Victor Stinner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Someone asked somewhere (oops, I forgot where!) when is Python 3.7.1
> scheduled. I wanted to reply when I saw that it was scheduled for 2
> months ago:
>
> "3.7.1: 2018-07-xx"
> https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0537/#maintenance-releases
>
Hello everyone,
According to the [doc][1], `collections.Counter` convenience intersection
and union functions are meant to help it represent multisets. However, it
currently lacks comparisons, which would make sense and seems
straightforward to implement.
Am I missing something here or should I se
On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 10:55, Victor Stinner wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It's no longer possible to merge any change in the 3.6 branch of
> CPython, because the AppVeyor job fails:
> https://bugs.python.org/issue34575
>
> It seems like AppVeyor has a build cache and this cache is outdated. I
> tried to use
Hi,
Someone asked somewhere (oops, I forgot where!) when is Python 3.7.1
scheduled. I wanted to reply when I saw that it was scheduled for 2
months ago:
"3.7.1: 2018-07-xx"
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0537/#maintenance-releases
Is there any blocker for 3.7.1? I fixed dozens of bugs in th
Hi,
It's no longer possible to merge any change in the 3.6 branch of
CPython, because the AppVeyor job fails:
https://bugs.python.org/issue34575
It seems like AppVeyor has a build cache and this cache is outdated. I
tried to use the REST API but I'm not allowed to invalidate the cache:
even the m
23 matches
Mail list logo
