On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 9:11 AM Michael Selik wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 8:35 AM Sean Harrington wrote:
>> Further, let me pivot on my idea of __qualname__...we can use the `id` of
>> `func` as the cache key to address your concern, and store this `id` on the
>> `task` tuple (i.e. an inte
Slightly Off-Topic, but more relevant for python developers. Paramiko also
had a very similar vulnerability:
https://github.com/paramiko/paramiko/issues/1283.
On Thu, 18 Oct 2018 at 18:56, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Oct 2018 17:41:29 +0100
> MRAB wrote:
> > I wondered if any of you have
Primarily for non-windows platforms, but I also think for Windows users
without any compilers or similar tools installed. There is also some
discussion of removing some of the older toolchain-specific versions
(leaving only -14), but that is a subject for another day.
Also I am not sure that bug r
On Thu, 18 Oct 2018 17:41:29 +0100
MRAB wrote:
> I wondered if any of you have heard of this:
>
> Hacker: I'm logged in. New LibSSH Vulnerability: OK! I believe you.
> https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/hacker-im-logged-in-new-libssh-vulnerability-ok-i-believe-you/
AFAIK, this doesn'
One idea would be for the Pool method to generate a uuid and slap it on the
function as an attribute. If a function being passed in doesn't have one,
generate one. If it already has one, just pass that instead of pickling.
The child process will keep a cache mapping uuids to functions.
I'm still w
I wondered if any of you have heard of this:
Hacker: I'm logged in. New LibSSH Vulnerability: OK! I believe you.
https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/hacker-im-logged-in-new-libssh-vulnerability-ok-i-believe-you/
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Py
On 10/18/18 4:40 PM, Zachary Ware wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 9:09 AM VanL wrote:
Hi all,
I am looking into an issue associated with the wininst-*.exe files in the
distutils/command subdirectory. It looks like these are the executable stubs
used to create self-extracting zips for installa
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 8:35 AM Sean Harrington
wrote:
> The most common use case comes up when passing instance methods (of really
> big objects!) to Pool.map().
>
This reminds me of that old joke: "A patient says to the doctor, 'Doctor,
it hurts when I ...!' The doctor replies, 'Well, don't do
You have correctly identified the summary of my intentions, and I agree
with your reasoning & concern - however there is a somewhat reasonable
answer as to why this optimization has never been implemented:
In Pool, the `task` tuple consists of (result_job, func, (x,), {}) . This
is the object tha
Thank you all, this gives me what I need. Sorry I missed the source in the
the PC/ directory.
Thanks,
Van
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 9:41 AM Zachary Ware
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 9:09 AM VanL wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am looking into an issue associated with the wininst-*.exe files in
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 9:09 AM VanL wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am looking into an issue associated with the wininst-*.exe files in the
> distutils/command subdirectory. It looks like these are the executable stubs
> used to create self-extracting zips for installation - but I am not 100%
> sure. I
They are for the distutils bdist_wininst command (mostly obsolete now,
wheels are the preferred binary distribution format these days). The
source appears to be in PC\bdist_wininst in the CPython repository.
Paul
On Thu, 18 Oct 2018 at 15:10, VanL wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am looking into an issue
Hi all,
I am looking into an issue associated with the wininst-*.exe files in the
distutils/command subdirectory. It looks like these are the executable
stubs used to create self-extracting zips for installation - but I am not
100% sure. It also looks like they include the calls to standard Window
13 matches
Mail list logo
